The Theological Philosophy of the Bible in Dealing with Diseases: An Evaluative Study

This study examines the philosophy of disease in the Bible, exploring the concept of illness, its terminology, causes, types, and theological objectives. It also investigates healing methods mentioned in the Bible and critically evaluates them through the lens of the Islamic perspective. The study finds areas of overlap, yet highlights fundamental differences rooted in the distinct theological frameworks of monotheism and trinitarianism. It emphasizes the importance of understanding terminological nuances when comparing both approaches. While some similarities exist regarding the types, causes, purposes, and treatments of illness, the Islamic approach offers a more comprehensive, scientifically grounded methodology that also considers spiritual rewards for those who patiently endure illness—an aspect absent in biblical texts. The study concludes with recommendations, including a critical comparative analysis of biblical commentators and Qur’anic exegetes on the subject of disease.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Al-Idah | Shaykh Zayed Islamic Centre University of Peshawar
Published
2025-06-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.37556/al-idah.043.01.0935
Primary Topic
Biblical Studies and Interpretation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Theological Philosophy of the Bible in Dealing with Diseases: An Evaluative Study

Mohammed Mustafa Al-Jadi
Al-Idah | Shaykh Zayed Islamic Centre University of Peshawar
Biblical Studies and Interpretation
article

The Theological Philosophy of the Bible in Dealing with Diseases: An Evaluative Study

Mohammed Mustafa Al-Jadi
article en

Abstract

This study examines the philosophy of disease in the Bible, exploring the concept of illness, its terminology, causes, types, and theological objectives. It also investigates healing methods mentioned in the Bible and critically evaluates them through the lens of the Islamic perspective. The study finds areas of overlap, yet highlights fundamental differences rooted in the distinct theological frameworks of monotheism and trinitarianism. It emphasizes the importance of understanding terminological nuances when comparing both approaches. While some similarities exist regarding the types, causes, purposes, and treatments of illness, the Islamic approach offers a more comprehensive, scientifically grounded methodology that also considers spiritual rewards for those who patiently endure illness—an aspect absent in biblical texts. The study concludes with recommendations, including a critical comparative analysis of biblical commentators and Qur’anic exegetes on the subject of disease.

Al-Idah | Shaykh Zayed Islamic Centre University of PeshawarVol. 43(-1)
Islamic University of Gaza (PS)
Openalex Percentile: Top 85%
Biblical Studies and Interpretation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.