Optimal multi-use cycle scenarios for temporary demountable modular building systems: An environmental sustainability perspective
Currently, there is limited understanding of how many years and how many times building systems can be reused while remaining minimal adverse environmental impacts from a multi-use cycle perspective. This study aims to identify optimal multi-use cycle scenarios for a demountable modular unit that achieves minimal environmental impacts. Multi-objective optimization was conducted to determine the optimal number of use cycles and the duration of each cycle, focusing on minimizing both environmental cost and residual value. Six Pareto-optimal scenarios were identified to minimize both the environmental costs of embodied and operational carbon emissions and residual value. They are [5-yr, 5-yr], [5-yr, 25-yr], [10-yr, 25-yr], [15-yr, 25-yr], [20-yr, 25-yr], and [25-yr, 25-yr], implying that the optimal number of use cycles is two. The finding serves as valuable insight for developing end-of-life planning strategies that promote the sustainable reuse of demountable modular building systems. • Identify optimal reuse scenarios by examining environmental cost and residual value. • The optimal number of use cycles for the investigated modular building system is two. • The length of the first use cycle should not be longer than the second one.
Authors
- Albert P.C. Chan (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4853-6440)
- Bowen Zheng (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5922-9780)
- Calvin Luk (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6916-8747)
- Ting Wang (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6586-2053)
- Yang Yang (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3224-2971)
Institutions
- Oxford Brookes University (GB)
- Hong Kong Polytechnic University (HK)
- Hong Kong Jockey Club (HK)
- Shanghai Institute of Technology (CN)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Developments in the Built Environment
- Published
- 2025-07-26
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dibe.2025.100727
- Primary Topic
- BIM and Construction Integration
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00
Funders
- Research Grants Council, University Grants Committee
- Construction Industry Council