Analysis of international climate change governance for the agriculture, forest and land use sector: Gaps and recommendations for future improvement

The crucial role of land-based activities in climate change mitigation and adaptation has gained recognition under the Paris Agreement, including through the commitments outlined in Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs). While technical assessments highlight the mitigation potential of the land sector, this potential is constrained by several challenges, particularly competing demands across development, social, environmental and climate objectives. International governance structures for land use often fail to address these multiple objectives, which makes it challenging to ensure sound arbitrages among them. This paper evaluates the current international governance landscape in the Agriculture, Forestry, and Other Land Use (AFOLU) sector, analysing governance functions that address barriers to climate change mitigation globally and assessing the extent to which these functions are met. Our findings indicate that while existing governance frameworks address barriers through guidance, rule-setting, transparency and accountability, support for implementation, and knowledge dissemination, gaps remain, particularly in guidance and signalling, transparency and rules and standards. Other key gaps identified are the insufficiency of the funds mobilised so far, the limitations of global assessments, and the duplicity of efforts and disconnection across different initiatives. Closing these governance gaps is essential to enable effective global governance in the AFOLU sector and unlock its mitigation potential. We propose potential solutions to bridge these gaps. • Complex and fragmented AFOLU governance hinders the sector's mitigation potential. • Governance functions face gaps in signalling, standards, transparency, funding, and alignment. • Coherent MRV standards and partnerships are key to improving transparency and funding. • Technical dialogue platforms can help coordinate and guide a sector-wide approach.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Earth System Governance
Published
2025-07-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esg.2025.100278
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Climate Change Policy and Economics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
9.39

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Analysis of international climate change governance for the agriculture, forest and land use sector: Gaps and recommendations for future improvement

Alejandro Blazquez, María José Sanz
3 citations
Earth System Governance
Climate Change Policy and Economics
9.39
article

Analysis of international climate change governance for the agriculture, forest and land use sector: Gaps and recommendations for future improvement

Alejandro Blazquez, María José Sanz
article en
3 citations

Abstract

The crucial role of land-based activities in climate change mitigation and adaptation has gained recognition under the Paris Agreement, including through the commitments outlined in Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs). While technical assessments highlight the mitigation potential of the land sector, this potential is constrained by several challenges, particularly competing demands across development, social, environmental and climate objectives. International governance structures for land use often fail to address these multiple objectives, which makes it challenging to ensure sound arbitrages among them. This paper evaluates the current international governance landscape in the Agriculture, Forestry, and Other Land Use (AFOLU) sector, analysing governance functions that address barriers to climate change mitigation globally and assessing the extent to which these functions are met. Our findings indicate that while existing governance frameworks address barriers through guidance, rule-setting, transparency and accountability, support for implementation, and knowledge dissemination, gaps remain, particularly in guidance and signalling, transparency and rules and standards. Other key gaps identified are the insufficiency of the funds mobilised so far, the limitations of global assessments, and the duplicity of efforts and disconnection across different initiatives. Closing these governance gaps is essential to enable effective global governance in the AFOLU sector and unlock its mitigation potential. We propose potential solutions to bridge these gaps. • Complex and fragmented AFOLU governance hinders the sector's mitigation potential. • Governance functions face gaps in signalling, standards, transparency, funding, and alignment. • Coherent MRV standards and partnerships are key to improving transparency and funding. • Technical dialogue platforms can help coordinate and guide a sector-wide approach.

Earth System GovernanceVol. 25
Ikerbasque (ES), Basque Centre for Climate Change (ES)
European Commission, Eusko Jaurlaritza, Horizon 2020 Framework Programme, Agencia Estatal de Investigación
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Climate Change Policy and Economics
9.39
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.