Neural network classification of Barnes maze search strategy utilization

The Barnes maze is a commonly used test of allocentric spatial reference memory, consisting of an elevated circular table with holes around the perimeter. Spatial cues surrounding the maze are intended to allow the animal on the maze to locate a target hole from which they can escape and return to their home cage during a period of acquisition trials. Following the acquisition period, the target box under the target hole is removed and a probe trial is performed to test spatial memory. One of the limitations of Barnes maze testing is that non-spatial strategies can be employed to locate the target hole, such as systematic serial searching hole to hole, which may mask the signal of spatial learning or memory deficits on gross outcome measures, such as the latency to find the target hole. Quantifying the search strategies used during Barnes maze testing can provide a more direct measurement of spatial memory impairments, and even allow for the detection of impairments to executive functioning and working memory that may impact the ability to utilize non-spatial systematic search strategies. We have developed a machine learning algorithm to automatically quantify search strategy utilization in an unbiased manner. Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is known to cause impairments in spatial learning and memory, and in our testing with a model of repetitive mild TBI we have found significant deficits in the utilization of both spatial and systematic non-spatial search strategies 3 months after TBI. Understanding the factors driving gross outcome measures on the Barnes maze may provide greater insight into the effectiveness of potential treatment strategies designed to mitigate the chronic effects of TBI and other neurodegenerative diseases.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Brain Research Bulletin
Published
2025-07-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainresbull.2025.111483
Citations
2
Primary Topic
AI-based Problem Solving and Planning
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.96
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Neural network classification of Barnes maze search strategy utilization

Benoit Mouzon, MICHAEL J. MULLAN, Cillian Lynch, Coral Hahn-Townsend et al.
2 citations
Brain Research Bulletin
AI-based Problem Solving and Planning
4.96
article

Neural network classification of Barnes maze search strategy utilization

Benoit Mouzon, MICHAEL J. MULLAN, Cillian Lynch, Coral Hahn-Townsend, Nicole Saltiel, Giuseppe Brunetti, Scott Ferguson, Fiona Crawford, Salina Yathiraj
article en
2 citations

Abstract

The Barnes maze is a commonly used test of allocentric spatial reference memory, consisting of an elevated circular table with holes around the perimeter. Spatial cues surrounding the maze are intended to allow the animal on the maze to locate a target hole from which they can escape and return to their home cage during a period of acquisition trials. Following the acquisition period, the target box under the target hole is removed and a probe trial is performed to test spatial memory. One of the limitations of Barnes maze testing is that non-spatial strategies can be employed to locate the target hole, such as systematic serial searching hole to hole, which may mask the signal of spatial learning or memory deficits on gross outcome measures, such as the latency to find the target hole. Quantifying the search strategies used during Barnes maze testing can provide a more direct measurement of spatial memory impairments, and even allow for the detection of impairments to executive functioning and working memory that may impact the ability to utilize non-spatial systematic search strategies. We have developed a machine learning algorithm to automatically quantify search strategy utilization in an unbiased manner. Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is known to cause impairments in spatial learning and memory, and in our testing with a model of repetitive mild TBI we have found significant deficits in the utilization of both spatial and systematic non-spatial search strategies 3 months after TBI. Understanding the factors driving gross outcome measures on the Barnes maze may provide greater insight into the effectiveness of potential treatment strategies designed to mitigate the chronic effects of TBI and other neurodegenerative diseases.

Brain Research BulletinVol. 230
Roskamp Institute (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
AI-based Problem Solving and Planning
4.96
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.