Future precipitation extremes: Differential changes from point to catchment scale revealed by a convection-permitting model ensemble

Understanding spatial scale-dependent changes in extreme precipitation is crucial for flood risk adaptation in a warming climate. This study investigates how future changes in sub-daily to daily extreme precipitation can be transferred from point to catchment scales. We use the areal reduction factor (ARF) concept to quantify the impact of climate change on extremes at multiple scales from point (individual model grid cell) to catchment scales up to 3,751 km 2 in the upper Adige River basin, eastern Italian Alps. We apply the Simplified Metastatistical Extreme Value (SMEV) framework to estimate extreme precipitation return levels (1–24 h durations, up to 100-year return periods) at multiple spatial scales using an ensemble of nine convection-permitting models from FPS-CORDEX. Models provide hourly precipitation data (remapped to 3 km grid) for historical (1996–2005) and future (2090–2099) periods under the RCP8.5 scenario. Our results show that ARFs derived by the models in the historical period align well with ARFs values obtained from observations. Under future scenarios, changes in ARFs cannot be in general deemed statistically significant, due to the important inter-model variability. ARFs slightly increase for short durations (1–3 h) and low-to-medium return periods (2–20 years) over small basins ( < 100 m a t h r m k m 2 ), suggesting more spatially uniform extremes at these scales. Conversely, ARFs decrease for longer durations, larger basins and high return periods, implying that corresponding areal design precipitation will increase less than point precipitation under the same conditions. Our results highlight the need for high-resolution ensemble modeling to capture inter-model variability in extreme precipitation projections. • ARFs of Historical CPMs align with observed data, confirming models reliability. • ARFs used to quantify how changes are transferred from point to area. • Future ARFs show changes: increased for short durations, decreased for extremes. • Found important ARFs variability in CPMs ensemble.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Hydrology
Published
2025-07-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2025.133822
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Climate variability and models
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.21
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Future precipitation extremes: Differential changes from point to catchment scale revealed by a convection-permitting model ensemble

Petr Vohnicky, Marco Borga, Giorgia Fosser, Francesco Marra et al.
2 citations
Journal of Hydrology
Climate variability and models
2.21
article

Future precipitation extremes: Differential changes from point to catchment scale revealed by a convection-permitting model ensemble

Petr Vohnicky, Marco Borga, Giorgia Fosser, Francesco Marra, Eleonora Dallan
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Understanding spatial scale-dependent changes in extreme precipitation is crucial for flood risk adaptation in a warming climate. This study investigates how future changes in sub-daily to daily extreme precipitation can be transferred from point to catchment scales. We use the areal reduction factor (ARF) concept to quantify the impact of climate change on extremes at multiple scales from point (individual model grid cell) to catchment scales up to 3,751 km 2 in the upper Adige River basin, eastern Italian Alps. We apply the Simplified Metastatistical Extreme Value (SMEV) framework to estimate extreme precipitation return levels (1–24 h durations, up to 100-year return periods) at multiple spatial scales using an ensemble of nine convection-permitting models from FPS-CORDEX. Models provide hourly precipitation data (remapped to 3 km grid) for historical (1996–2005) and future (2090–2099) periods under the RCP8.5 scenario. Our results show that ARFs derived by the models in the historical period align well with ARFs values obtained from observations. Under future scenarios, changes in ARFs cannot be in general deemed statistically significant, due to the important inter-model variability. ARFs slightly increase for short durations (1–3 h) and low-to-medium return periods (2–20 years) over small basins ( < 100 m a t h r m k m 2 ), suggesting more spatially uniform extremes at these scales. Conversely, ARFs decrease for longer durations, larger basins and high return periods, implying that corresponding areal design precipitation will increase less than point precipitation under the same conditions. Our results highlight the need for high-resolution ensemble modeling to capture inter-model variability in extreme precipitation projections. • ARFs of Historical CPMs align with observed data, confirming models reliability. • ARFs used to quantify how changes are transferred from point to area. • Future ARFs show changes: increased for short durations, decreased for extremes. • Found important ARFs variability in CPMs ensemble.

Journal of HydrologyVol. 662
University of Padua (IT), Istituto Universitario di Studi Superiori di Pavia (IT)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Climate variability and models
2.21
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.