Ecological and Environmental Restoration Liability Judicial Application Dilemmas and Solutions

Ecological and environmental restoration liability, as a novel form of legal responsibility, has gradually become a crucial means of remedying ecological and environmental damage. However, in judicial practice, its application still faces practical obstacles such as the absence of a systematic institutional guarantee for restoration liability, the narrow scope of liable entities, ambiguous restoration objectives, lack of standardized management for restoration funds, and an underdeveloped oversight system for ecological and environmental restoration. Therefore, to achieve the Chinese modernization characterized by the harmonious coexistence of humans and nature, it is necessary to elevate the judicial application of ecological and environmental restoration liability to a new level. This can be achieved by improving the legal basis for its application, expanding the scope of liable entities, clarifying restoration objectives, refining the regulatory framework for restoration funds, and enhancing the supervision mechanisms for ecological restoration.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Sociology and Ethnology
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.23977/jsoce.2025.070311
Primary Topic
Environmental Conservation and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Ecological and Environmental Restoration Liability Judicial Application Dilemmas and Solutions

Journal of Sociology and Ethnology
Environmental Conservation and Management
article

Ecological and Environmental Restoration Liability Judicial Application Dilemmas and Solutions

article en

Abstract

Ecological and environmental restoration liability, as a novel form of legal responsibility, has gradually become a crucial means of remedying ecological and environmental damage. However, in judicial practice, its application still faces practical obstacles such as the absence of a systematic institutional guarantee for restoration liability, the narrow scope of liable entities, ambiguous restoration objectives, lack of standardized management for restoration funds, and an underdeveloped oversight system for ecological and environmental restoration. Therefore, to achieve the Chinese modernization characterized by the harmonious coexistence of humans and nature, it is necessary to elevate the judicial application of ecological and environmental restoration liability to a new level. This can be achieved by improving the legal basis for its application, expanding the scope of liable entities, clarifying restoration objectives, refining the regulatory framework for restoration funds, and enhancing the supervision mechanisms for ecological restoration.

Journal of Sociology and EthnologyVol. 7(3)
Southwest Petroleum University (CN)
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 75%
Environmental Conservation and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Ecological and Environmental Restoration Liability Judicial Application Dilemmas and Solutions · Journal of Sociology and Ethnology (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS