On the accuracy of self-reported data for fishing effort estimates – A case study from a polyvalent coastal fishery

The quantification and the analysis of fishing activity is one the most important features in fisheries sciences and ocean management, and fishery-dependent data has always been the main source of information used to that end. Within the different types of fishery-dependent data, self-reported logbook data provides vast amounts of different information about fishing activities. Despite their enormous importance, the quality and reliability of these data are surprisingly understudied. Yet, the accuracy and consistency of this type of data are sometimes difficult to quantify. With the purpose of studying how logbook data can be a reliable source for fishing effort quantification, here we estimate and compare, for the Portuguese mainland coastal polyvalent fleet, the fishing effort of each vessel from two types of fishery-dependent data: 1- logbook data and 2- official landing data. The results showed a difference of 22.7 % between the overall number of fishing trips from both data types. In particular, vessels had a significantly lower number of fishing trips logged on logbook data than the trips estimated from official landing data. Our findings support the concerns regarding the accuracy of logbook data, especially for estimating fishing effort. As far as effort inference is concerned, we suggest that the estimation of fishing effort from data logged and recorded from a third party, like official landing data, is a more reliable source of information than self-reported data. • Logbook data, due to its self-reported nature, poses some concerns on its reliability and accuracy. • Assessments on its quality for fishery-related inferences are surprisingly few. • Self-reported (logbook) and 3rd party logged and reported (official landings) data were compared for fishing effort estimates. • Logbook data underestimates the fishing effort by more than 22 % when compared with estimates based on official landings data. • At vessel level however, the difference between fishing effort estimated from both datasets varies distinctively.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Fisheries Research
Published
2025-07-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fishres.2025.107483
Primary Topic
Marine and fisheries research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

On the accuracy of self-reported data for fishing effort estimates – A case study from a polyvalent coastal fishery

Jorge M.S. Gonçalves, Nuno Sales Henriques, Karim Erzini, Tommaso Russo
Fisheries Research
Marine and fisheries research
article

On the accuracy of self-reported data for fishing effort estimates – A case study from a polyvalent coastal fishery

Jorge M.S. Gonçalves, Nuno Sales Henriques, Karim Erzini, Tommaso Russo
article en

Abstract

The quantification and the analysis of fishing activity is one the most important features in fisheries sciences and ocean management, and fishery-dependent data has always been the main source of information used to that end. Within the different types of fishery-dependent data, self-reported logbook data provides vast amounts of different information about fishing activities. Despite their enormous importance, the quality and reliability of these data are surprisingly understudied. Yet, the accuracy and consistency of this type of data are sometimes difficult to quantify. With the purpose of studying how logbook data can be a reliable source for fishing effort quantification, here we estimate and compare, for the Portuguese mainland coastal polyvalent fleet, the fishing effort of each vessel from two types of fishery-dependent data: 1- logbook data and 2- official landing data. The results showed a difference of 22.7 % between the overall number of fishing trips from both data types. In particular, vessels had a significantly lower number of fishing trips logged on logbook data than the trips estimated from official landing data. Our findings support the concerns regarding the accuracy of logbook data, especially for estimating fishing effort. As far as effort inference is concerned, we suggest that the estimation of fishing effort from data logged and recorded from a third party, like official landing data, is a more reliable source of information than self-reported data. • Logbook data, due to its self-reported nature, poses some concerns on its reliability and accuracy. • Assessments on its quality for fishery-related inferences are surprisingly few. • Self-reported (logbook) and 3rd party logged and reported (official landings) data were compared for fishing effort estimates. • Logbook data underestimates the fishing effort by more than 22 % when compared with estimates based on official landings data. • At vessel level however, the difference between fishing effort estimated from both datasets varies distinctively.

Fisheries ResearchVol. 288
University of Rome Tor Vergata (IT), University of Algarve (PT)
Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
Life below water
Openalex Percentile: Top 83%
Marine and fisheries research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.