Binocular vs. monocular 3D cues in multiple object tracking: expertise differences between soccer players and non-athletes

Classical two-dimensional multiple object tracking (2D-MOT) measures the cognitive ability to track multiple moving elements in real-life-like scenarios. Stereo-three-dimensional MOT (S-3D-MOT), a more ecologically valid form of 2D-MOT, shows better tracking performance in soccer players. Its unique feature is the additional binocular and monocular 3D cues compared to 2D-MOT, but their individual contributions to MOT performance are unclear. To fill this research gap, the current study introduced a three-dimensional MOT task on a flat screen (F-3D-MOT) to distinguish the roles of binocular and monocular 3D cues. F-3D-MOT provides additional monocular 3D cues compared to classical 2D-MOT but lacks binocular 3D cues compared to S-3D-MOT. Moreover, whether the effects of these 3D cues on MOT performance vary between soccer players and non-athletes remains unclear. Therefore, both groups were recruited for this study. The results showed that soccer players performed significantly better than non-athletes specifically in S-3D-MOT, indicating their enhanced sensitivity to binocular 3D cues. In contrast, neither monocular cues (F-3D-MOT) nor 2D displays led to significant differences between the two groups.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cognitive Research Principles and Implications
Published
2025-07-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s41235-025-00658-x
Primary Topic
Visual perception and processing mechanisms
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Binocular vs. monocular 3D cues in multiple object tracking: expertise differences between soccer players and non-athletes

Jiayue Ma, Xiang Che, Jijun Lan, Hui Qi et al.
Cognitive Research Principles and Implications
Visual perception and processing mechanisms
article

Binocular vs. monocular 3D cues in multiple object tracking: expertise differences between soccer players and non-athletes

Jiayue Ma, Xiang Che, Jijun Lan, Hui Qi, Kun Zhang, Jie Li, Yu Zhang, Qian Zhou, Chen Zhou
article en

Abstract

Classical two-dimensional multiple object tracking (2D-MOT) measures the cognitive ability to track multiple moving elements in real-life-like scenarios. Stereo-three-dimensional MOT (S-3D-MOT), a more ecologically valid form of 2D-MOT, shows better tracking performance in soccer players. Its unique feature is the additional binocular and monocular 3D cues compared to 2D-MOT, but their individual contributions to MOT performance are unclear. To fill this research gap, the current study introduced a three-dimensional MOT task on a flat screen (F-3D-MOT) to distinguish the roles of binocular and monocular 3D cues. F-3D-MOT provides additional monocular 3D cues compared to classical 2D-MOT but lacks binocular 3D cues compared to S-3D-MOT. Moreover, whether the effects of these 3D cues on MOT performance vary between soccer players and non-athletes remains unclear. Therefore, both groups were recruited for this study. The results showed that soccer players performed significantly better than non-athletes specifically in S-3D-MOT, indicating their enhanced sensitivity to binocular 3D cues. In contrast, neither monocular cues (F-3D-MOT) nor 2D displays led to significant differences between the two groups.

Cognitive Research Principles and ImplicationsVol. 10(1)
Xi'an University of Science and Technology (CN), Hangzhou Normal University (CN), Ya'an Polytechnic College (CN), Affiliated Hospital of Hangzhou Normal University (CN), Northwest Normal University (CN), Beijing Sport University (CN), Shaanxi Normal University (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China, Ministry of Education of the People's Republic of China, Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities
Openalex Percentile: Top 82%
Visual perception and processing mechanisms
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.