Semiparametric Approaches for Mitigating Spatial Confounding in Large Environmental Epidemiology Cohort Studies

Epidemiological analyses of environmental risk factors often include spatially-varying exposures and outcomes. Unmeasured, spatially-varying factors can lead to confounding bias in estimates of associations with adverse health outcomes. Several approaches for mitigating this bias have been developed using semiparametric splines. These methods use thin plate regression splines to account for the spatial variation present in the analysis but differ in how to select the amount of spatial smoothing and in whether the exposure, the outcome, or both are smoothed. We directly compare current approaches based on information criteria and cross-validation metrics, and additionally introduce a hybrid method to selection that combines features from multiple existing approaches. We compare these methods in a simulation study to make a recommendation for the best approach for different settings and demonstrate their use in a study of environmental exposures on birth weight in a Colorado cohort.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Environmetrics
Published
2025-07-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/env.70028
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Air Quality and Health Impacts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.20

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Semiparametric Approaches for Mitigating Spatial Confounding in Large Environmental Epidemiology Cohort Studies

Kayleigh P. Keller, Maddie J. Rainey
1 citations
Environmetrics
Air Quality and Health Impacts
1.20
article

Semiparametric Approaches for Mitigating Spatial Confounding in Large Environmental Epidemiology Cohort Studies

Kayleigh P. Keller, Maddie J. Rainey
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Epidemiological analyses of environmental risk factors often include spatially-varying exposures and outcomes. Unmeasured, spatially-varying factors can lead to confounding bias in estimates of associations with adverse health outcomes. Several approaches for mitigating this bias have been developed using semiparametric splines. These methods use thin plate regression splines to account for the spatial variation present in the analysis but differ in how to select the amount of spatial smoothing and in whether the exposure, the outcome, or both are smoothed. We directly compare current approaches based on information criteria and cross-validation metrics, and additionally introduce a hybrid method to selection that combines features from multiple existing approaches. We compare these methods in a simulation study to make a recommendation for the best approach for different settings and demonstrate their use in a study of environmental exposures on birth weight in a Colorado cohort.

EnvironmetricsVol. 36(6)
Colorado State University (US)
Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment, National Institutes of Health, National Institute on Aging
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Air Quality and Health Impacts
1.20
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Semiparametric Approaches for Mitigating Spatial Confounding in Large Environmental Epidemiology Cohort Studies — Kayleigh P. Keller, Maddie J. Rainey · Environmetrics (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS