Elevated lung cancer screening needs among emergency department patients

More than 10% of Emergency Department (ED) cancer-related visits are for lung cancer . Timely lung cancer screening is an effective mechanism to decrease lung cancer morbidity and mortality, but only 16% of eligible patients in the general population are up-to-date with lung cancer screening recommendations. Furthermore, many characteristics found predictive of non-adherence with screening are over-represented within the ED patient population. The goal of this study is to determine risk for non-adherence with USPSTF lung cancer screening guidelines among the ED patient population. Data on smoking history and lung cancer screening were abstracted from the medical charts of patients 50-80 years old presenting to the <Blinded> ED during 2023. Adherence with guidelines among eligible patients was determined by documentation of lung cancer screening in the year prior to ED presentation. We also evaluated any screening that occurred within 120 days of their ED visit. A total of 559 patient charts were reviewed, with 354 having a documented history of tobacco use (63%). Pack year estimates were available for 252 patients, and 116 patients had a 20+ pack year smoking history documented (e.g., eligible for lung cancer screening). Among those, 14 individuals received LCS in the past year, representing a screening adherence rate of 12% at presentation. By 120 days post-visit, the rate declined to 9%. ED patients are at elevated risk for non-adherence with LCS guidelines, supporting previous work that demonstrates the potential value of ED-based intervention efforts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
JEM Reports
Published
2025-07-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jemrpt.2025.100188
Primary Topic
Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Elevated lung cancer screening needs among emergency department patients

Beau Abar, David Adler, George Ashji
JEM Reports
Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
article

Elevated lung cancer screening needs among emergency department patients

Beau Abar, David Adler, George Ashji
article en

Abstract

More than 10% of Emergency Department (ED) cancer-related visits are for lung cancer . Timely lung cancer screening is an effective mechanism to decrease lung cancer morbidity and mortality, but only 16% of eligible patients in the general population are up-to-date with lung cancer screening recommendations. Furthermore, many characteristics found predictive of non-adherence with screening are over-represented within the ED patient population. The goal of this study is to determine risk for non-adherence with USPSTF lung cancer screening guidelines among the ED patient population. Data on smoking history and lung cancer screening were abstracted from the medical charts of patients 50-80 years old presenting to the <Blinded> ED during 2023. Adherence with guidelines among eligible patients was determined by documentation of lung cancer screening in the year prior to ED presentation. We also evaluated any screening that occurred within 120 days of their ED visit. A total of 559 patient charts were reviewed, with 354 having a documented history of tobacco use (63%). Pack year estimates were available for 252 patients, and 116 patients had a 20+ pack year smoking history documented (e.g., eligible for lung cancer screening). Among those, 14 individuals received LCS in the past year, representing a screening adherence rate of 12% at presentation. By 120 days post-visit, the rate declined to 9%. ED patients are at elevated risk for non-adherence with LCS guidelines, supporting previous work that demonstrates the potential value of ED-based intervention efforts.

JEM ReportsVol. 4(3)
University of Rochester Medical Center (US)
Medical Center, University of Rochester
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.