Feasibility, acceptability and appropriateness of laparoscopic versus abdominal hysterectomy for women and healthcare professionals: the LAVA trial qualitative process evaluation

This article presents independent research funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme as award number NIHR128991.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Health Technology Assessment
Published
2025-03-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3310/gjtc1325
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Uterine Myomas and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.06

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Feasibility, acceptability and appropriateness of laparoscopic versus abdominal hysterectomy for women and healthcare professionals: the LAVA trial qualitative process evaluation

Rebecca Woolley, T. Justin Clark, Lina Antoun, Lynsay Matthews et al.
1 citations
Health Technology Assessment
Uterine Myomas and Treatments
2.06
article

Feasibility, acceptability and appropriateness of laparoscopic versus abdominal hysterectomy for women and healthcare professionals: the LAVA trial qualitative process evaluation

Rebecca Woolley, T. Justin Clark, Lina Antoun, Lynsay Matthews, Monique Morgan, Ertan Sarıdoğan, Paul Smith, Sheriden Bevan, Lee Middleton, Laura Jones
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This article presents independent research funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme as award number NIHR128991.

Health Technology AssessmentVol. 30(14)
University College Hospital (GB), Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit (GB), University College London (GB), University of Birmingham (GB), University of the West of Scotland (GB)
Health Technology Assessment Programme
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Uterine Myomas and Treatments
2.06
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.