Alleviating the quantum Big-M problem

Abstract A major obstacle for quantum optimizers is the reformulation of constraints as a quadratic unconstrained binary optimization (QUBO). Current QUBO translators exaggerate the weight M of the penalty terms. Classically known as the “Big- M ” problem, the issue becomes even more daunting for quantum solvers, since it affects the physical energy scale. We take a systematic, encompassing look at the quantum big- M problem, revealing NP-hardness in finding the optimal M and establishing bounds on the Hamiltonian spectral gap Δ as a function of the weight M , inversely related to the expected run-time of quantum solvers. We propose a practical translation algorithm, based on SDP relaxation, that outperforms previous methods in numerical benchmarks. Our algorithm gives values of Δ orders of magnitude greater, e.g. for portfolio optimization instances. Solving such instances with an adiabatic algorithm on 6-qubits of an IonQ device, we observe significant advantages in time to solution and average solution quality. Our findings are relevant to quantum and quantum-inspired solvers alike.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
npj Quantum Information
Published
2025-07-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41534-025-01067-0
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
7.44
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Alleviating the quantum Big-M problem

Leandro Aolita, Sergi Ramos-Calderer, Ingo Roth, Edoardo Alessandroni et al.
3 citations
npj Quantum Information
Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
7.44
article

Alleviating the quantum Big-M problem

Leandro Aolita, Sergi Ramos-Calderer, Ingo Roth, Edoardo Alessandroni, Emiliano Traversi
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Abstract A major obstacle for quantum optimizers is the reformulation of constraints as a quadratic unconstrained binary optimization (QUBO). Current QUBO translators exaggerate the weight M of the penalty terms. Classically known as the “Big- M ” problem, the issue becomes even more daunting for quantum solvers, since it affects the physical energy scale. We take a systematic, encompassing look at the quantum big- M problem, revealing NP-hardness in finding the optimal M and establishing bounds on the Hamiltonian spectral gap Δ as a function of the weight M , inversely related to the expected run-time of quantum solvers. We propose a practical translation algorithm, based on SDP relaxation, that outperforms previous methods in numerical benchmarks. Our algorithm gives values of Δ orders of magnitude greater, e.g. for portfolio optimization instances. Solving such instances with an adiabatic algorithm on 6-qubits of an IonQ device, we observe significant advantages in time to solution and average solution quality. Our findings are relevant to quantum and quantum-inspired solvers alike.

npj Quantum InformationVol. 11(1)
École Supérieure des Sciences Économiques et Commerciales (FR), Scuola Internazionale Superiore di Studi Avanzati (IT), Technology Innovation Institute (AE), CY Cergy Paris Université (FR), Universitat de Barcelona (ES)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
7.44
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.