Digital smartphone versus analogue methods of measuring orbital implant motility after enucleation
In our analyses, Image-J was found to be a more accurate measure of orbital implant motility, than mediGrid.
Authors
- David Carpenter (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7697-511X)
- Mandeep S. Sagoo (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1530-3824)
- Andrew W. Stacey (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4441-6302)
- Noha M Soliman (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0002-3320)
- David Sia (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0749-7614)
- Bhavesh P. Gopal
- Stephen T. Bell (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3014-254X)
Institutions
- Royal Adelaide Hospital (AU)
- Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
- Flinders University (AU)
- University of Washington (US)
- Royal London Hospital (GB)
- Flinders Medical Centre (AU)
- Institute for Employment Studies (GB)
- University of Warwick (GB)
- Moorfields Eye Hospital (GB)
- University College London (GB)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Eye
- Published
- 2025-07-26
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1038/s41433-025-03936-6
- Citations
- 1
- Primary Topic
- Ocular Disorders and Treatments
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 1.82
Funders
- NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust/Institute of Cancer Research
- National Institute for Health and Care Research
- Department of Health and Social Care
- Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
- Invention for Innovation