Anesthetic Personnel’s Experiences and Perspectives With a National Standard for Safeguarding Anesthesia Practice: A Cross‐Sectional Study in Norway

<b>Background:</b> Globally, anesthesiologists and nurse anesthetists collaborate closely during anesthesia administration. However, there is a scarcity of guidelines detailing the division of tasks and responsibilities between these two professions. The Norwegian Standard for the Safe Practice of Anesthesia (NSA) was developed jointly by the Norwegian Association of Anesthesiologists and the Norwegian Association of Nurse Anesthetists as a consensus guideline to safeguard satisfactory anesthetic practice. This study aimed to explore the experiences and perspectives of anesthesiologists and nurse anesthetists regarding the NSA. <b>Methods:</b> The study employed a cross-sectional, observational design, utilizing a questionnaire. A purposive sampling strategy was employed, inviting all members of the two associations (<i>N</i> = 3300) to participate in a web-based survey. Data were analyzed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences, Version 28. Descriptive statistics and independent samples <i>t</i>-tests were utilized to analyze the data. A two-sided <i>p</i> value of ≤ 0.05 was considered statistically significant. <b>Results:</b> In total, 823 respondents (24.9%) completed the questionnaire in September 2024. The results indicate several areas for improvement to achieve the recommended standards of anesthetic practice as outlined by the NSA. Statistically significant differences were observed between responses from anesthesiologists and nurse anesthetists. Approximately two-thirds of respondents reported the NSA as relevant to their daily work, and between 13 and 30 percent had experienced or were aware of situations where the standard was utilized in root cause analyses of adverse anesthetic events. <b>Conclusion:</b> The findings suggest that the NSA is employed in clinical practice. However, assuming the NSA ensures satisfactory anesthetic practice, there are several areas requiring improvement. Given the overlapping roles and responsibilities of anesthesiologists and nurse anesthetists, the NSA may serve as a model for similar guidelines in other countries.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Anesthesiology Research and Practice
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1155/anrp/6302974
Primary Topic
Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Anesthetic Personnel’s Experiences and Perspectives With a National Standard for Safeguarding Anesthesia Practice: A Cross‐Sectional Study in Norway

Erik Isern, Johan Ræder, Svein Arne Monsen, Therese Jenssen Finjarn et al.
1 links
Anesthesiology Research and Practice
Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes
article

Anesthetic Personnel’s Experiences and Perspectives With a National Standard for Safeguarding Anesthesia Practice: A Cross‐Sectional Study in Norway

Erik Isern, Johan Ræder, Svein Arne Monsen, Therese Jenssen Finjarn, Anne Marie Gran Bruun, Arvid Steinar Haugen, Jan Petter Ramstad, Elin Kismul Aakre, Cathrine Saltnes, Kristoffer Hennum, Tina Sand, Ann‐Chatrin Linqvist Leonardsen
article en

Abstract

<b>Background:</b> Globally, anesthesiologists and nurse anesthetists collaborate closely during anesthesia administration. However, there is a scarcity of guidelines detailing the division of tasks and responsibilities between these two professions. The Norwegian Standard for the Safe Practice of Anesthesia (NSA) was developed jointly by the Norwegian Association of Anesthesiologists and the Norwegian Association of Nurse Anesthetists as a consensus guideline to safeguard satisfactory anesthetic practice. This study aimed to explore the experiences and perspectives of anesthesiologists and nurse anesthetists regarding the NSA. <b>Methods:</b> The study employed a cross-sectional, observational design, utilizing a questionnaire. A purposive sampling strategy was employed, inviting all members of the two associations (<i>N</i> = 3300) to participate in a web-based survey. Data were analyzed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences, Version 28. Descriptive statistics and independent samples <i>t</i>-tests were utilized to analyze the data. A two-sided <i>p</i> value of ≤ 0.05 was considered statistically significant. <b>Results:</b> In total, 823 respondents (24.9%) completed the questionnaire in September 2024. The results indicate several areas for improvement to achieve the recommended standards of anesthetic practice as outlined by the NSA. Statistically significant differences were observed between responses from anesthesiologists and nurse anesthetists. Approximately two-thirds of respondents reported the NSA as relevant to their daily work, and between 13 and 30 percent had experienced or were aware of situations where the standard was utilized in root cause analyses of adverse anesthetic events. <b>Conclusion:</b> The findings suggest that the NSA is employed in clinical practice. However, assuming the NSA ensures satisfactory anesthetic practice, there are several areas requiring improvement. Given the overlapping roles and responsibilities of anesthesiologists and nurse anesthetists, the NSA may serve as a model for similar guidelines in other countries.

Anesthesiology Research and PracticeVol. 2025(1)
OsloMet – Oslo Metropolitan University (NO), University of Oslo (NO), Østfold University of Applied Sciences (NO), Haukeland University Hospital (NO), University of South-Eastern Norway (NO), Nord University (NO), St Olav's University Hospital (NO), Nordland Hospital (NO), Østfold Hospital Trust (NO), Hospital IT (NO)
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.