Tactile stimulation by humans: Do pigs prefer scratching or stroking?

Scratching and stroking are tactile interactions used to improve the animal-human relationship and reduce stress in pigs. Both interactions resemble behaviours from the behavioural repertoire of pigs and have been applied in previous studies. To investigate the relative efficacy of these tactile interactions in eliciting positive emotions, we examined pigs’ preferences for one of these interactions. Twelve recently inseminated gilts habituated to human contact were trained to discriminate between two handlers standing in two different locations in their home pen. One handler was providing stroking, the other one scratching. After 5 weeks of training, the pigs were tested for their preference. According to the preference index calculated based on the time the pigs spent being stroked and scratched, they did not significantly prefer one type of contact (p = 0.182, preference index median = 0.09, with -1 indicating an absolute preference for stroking and 1 an absolute preference for scratching). There was no significant difference between how often the pigs chose to approach the scratching or the stroking handler (p = 0.115, median scratching = 3.0, median stroking = 1.5), and neither did they approach one of them significantly earlier than the other (day 1: p = 0.126, median of difference between latency to approach scratching handler and latency to approach stroking handler = -55 s; day 2: p = 0.148, median of difference between latencies = -27 s). We did not find evidence for a general preference of one type of contact over the other. To improve the animal-human relationship, it might thus be most efficient to offer both types of tactile contact and adjust the contact depending on the pig’s behaviour indicative of enjoyment. • We investigated the existence of a general preference of scratching or stroking • Twelve pigs participated in 3-min choice tests on two days • There was no significant difference in preference index, frequency and latency • Pigs do not seem to generally prefer scratching over stroking or vice versa • Both types of contact can be applied equally to improve the pig-human relationship

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Applied Animal Behaviour Science
Published
2025-07-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2025.106768
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.35

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Tactile stimulation by humans: Do pigs prefer scratching or stroking?

Marietta Amann, P.H. Hemsworth, Susanne Waiblinger, Lena Lidfors et al.
1 citations
Applied Animal Behaviour Science
Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
2.35
article

Tactile stimulation by humans: Do pigs prefer scratching or stroking?

Marietta Amann, P.H. Hemsworth, Susanne Waiblinger, Lena Lidfors, Stephanie Lürzel, Janina Weißenborn
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Scratching and stroking are tactile interactions used to improve the animal-human relationship and reduce stress in pigs. Both interactions resemble behaviours from the behavioural repertoire of pigs and have been applied in previous studies. To investigate the relative efficacy of these tactile interactions in eliciting positive emotions, we examined pigs’ preferences for one of these interactions. Twelve recently inseminated gilts habituated to human contact were trained to discriminate between two handlers standing in two different locations in their home pen. One handler was providing stroking, the other one scratching. After 5 weeks of training, the pigs were tested for their preference. According to the preference index calculated based on the time the pigs spent being stroked and scratched, they did not significantly prefer one type of contact (p = 0.182, preference index median = 0.09, with -1 indicating an absolute preference for stroking and 1 an absolute preference for scratching). There was no significant difference between how often the pigs chose to approach the scratching or the stroking handler (p = 0.115, median scratching = 3.0, median stroking = 1.5), and neither did they approach one of them significantly earlier than the other (day 1: p = 0.126, median of difference between latency to approach scratching handler and latency to approach stroking handler = -55 s; day 2: p = 0.148, median of difference between latencies = -27 s). We did not find evidence for a general preference of one type of contact over the other. To improve the animal-human relationship, it might thus be most efficient to offer both types of tactile contact and adjust the contact depending on the pig’s behaviour indicative of enjoyment. • We investigated the existence of a general preference of scratching or stroking • Twelve pigs participated in 3-min choice tests on two days • There was no significant difference in preference index, frequency and latency • Pigs do not seem to generally prefer scratching over stroking or vice versa • Both types of contact can be applied equally to improve the pig-human relationship

Applied Animal Behaviour ScienceVol. 292
University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna (AT), The University of Melbourne (AU), Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SE), BOKU University (AT)
Austrian Science Fund
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
2.35
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.