Does Automated Consent Undermine Informed Consent?

Abstract The problem of self-managing one’s online privacy by reading and accepting numerous privacy policies—that are often long and hard to understand—is familiar as it is difficult. Only a small percentage of internet users, as a result, read all applicable policies and provide “informed” consent to companies or organisations to collect and share their personal data. In the last few years, “automated consent” has emerged as a possible solution. This is software that can provide consent on behalf of users. While promising, the technology raises a puzzle: if software can handle online agreements, thus allowing users to bypass them, might it undermine informed consent? This paper addresses the puzzle. In response to it, I introduce the concept of “higher-order consent” and show how it can help to facilitate a type of informed consent for users of automated consent. The paper also considers possible objections to this view and explores the normative implications of accepting the conclusion that automated consent undermines informed consent.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Philosophy & Technology
Published
2025-07-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-025-00945-x
Primary Topic
Deception detection and forensic psychology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Does Automated Consent Undermine Informed Consent?

Adam J. Andreotta
1 links
Philosophy & Technology
Deception detection and forensic psychology
article

Does Automated Consent Undermine Informed Consent?

Adam J. Andreotta
article en

Abstract

Abstract The problem of self-managing one’s online privacy by reading and accepting numerous privacy policies—that are often long and hard to understand—is familiar as it is difficult. Only a small percentage of internet users, as a result, read all applicable policies and provide “informed” consent to companies or organisations to collect and share their personal data. In the last few years, “automated consent” has emerged as a possible solution. This is software that can provide consent on behalf of users. While promising, the technology raises a puzzle: if software can handle online agreements, thus allowing users to bypass them, might it undermine informed consent? This paper addresses the puzzle. In response to it, I introduce the concept of “higher-order consent” and show how it can help to facilitate a type of informed consent for users of automated consent. The paper also considers possible objections to this view and explores the normative implications of accepting the conclusion that automated consent undermines informed consent.

Philosophy & TechnologyVol. 38(3)
Curtin University (AU)
Curtin University of Technology
Openalex Percentile: Top 79%
Deception detection and forensic psychology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.