Exploring experiences of the English special educational needs system through an online survey of young people, and parents and carers

Abstract Special educational needs and disability reforms were introduced in England in 2014 and further policy changes are imminent. Despite growing evidence of discontent with policy implementation, few peer‐reviewed surveys have examined the involvement and satisfaction of young people and their parents/carers in special educational needs and disabilities assessment, identification and provision. In co‐production with stakeholder groups, we developed an online survey to examine young people's and parents/carers' perceptions and experiences of special educational needs and disabilities identification, assessment and provision. Seventy‐seven young people and 770 parents/carers from across all regions of England responded. Parents/carers reported predominantly negative experiences; most disagreed that key providers were supportive of special educational needs and disabilities identification or that the professionals had a good understanding of their children's support needs. The parents/carers' views about the inclusion of children's goals and aspirations in education, health and care plans were slightly more positive, but many disagreed that the listed support matched what their child received. Young people's perspectives were slightly more positive, but only 54% said their support allowed them to access the same classes as their peers, and fewer than half trusted either teachers or health professionals to make the right decisions about their learning support needs. Our findings contribute to the small body of literature about how special educational needs and disabilities processes are experienced, particularly as co‐production of survey question anchors our findings in lived experience, the reporting of children and young people's experiences directly and questions addressing all agencies involved in special educational needs. Key providers may benefit from additional special educational needs and disabilities training, and parents/carers would value more support at the identification stage to ensure that young people receive timely and appropriate provision.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
British Journal of Special Education
Published
2025-07-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8578.70043
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Family and Disability Support Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.61

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Exploring experiences of the English special educational needs system through an online survey of young people, and parents and carers

Jacob Matthews, Isaac Winterburn, Nazneen Nazeer, William Farr et al.
2 citations
British Journal of Special Education
Family and Disability Support Research
4.61
article

Exploring experiences of the English special educational needs system through an online survey of young people, and parents and carers

Jacob Matthews, Isaac Winterburn, Nazneen Nazeer, William Farr, Eleanor Chatburn, Jennifer Saxton, Tamsin Jane Ford, Kristine Black‐Hawkins, Ariadna Albajara Sáenz, Miyuki Komachi
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Abstract Special educational needs and disability reforms were introduced in England in 2014 and further policy changes are imminent. Despite growing evidence of discontent with policy implementation, few peer‐reviewed surveys have examined the involvement and satisfaction of young people and their parents/carers in special educational needs and disabilities assessment, identification and provision. In co‐production with stakeholder groups, we developed an online survey to examine young people's and parents/carers' perceptions and experiences of special educational needs and disabilities identification, assessment and provision. Seventy‐seven young people and 770 parents/carers from across all regions of England responded. Parents/carers reported predominantly negative experiences; most disagreed that key providers were supportive of special educational needs and disabilities identification or that the professionals had a good understanding of their children's support needs. The parents/carers' views about the inclusion of children's goals and aspirations in education, health and care plans were slightly more positive, but many disagreed that the listed support matched what their child received. Young people's perspectives were slightly more positive, but only 54% said their support allowed them to access the same classes as their peers, and fewer than half trusted either teachers or health professionals to make the right decisions about their learning support needs. Our findings contribute to the small body of literature about how special educational needs and disabilities processes are experienced, particularly as co‐production of survey question anchors our findings in lived experience, the reporting of children and young people's experiences directly and questions addressing all agencies involved in special educational needs. Key providers may benefit from additional special educational needs and disabilities training, and parents/carers would value more support at the identification stage to ensure that young people receive timely and appropriate provision.

British Journal of Special EducationVol. 52(4)
University of East Anglia (GB), University of Kelaniya (LK), University of Cambridge (GB), St. Luke's International University (JP)
National Institute for Health and Care Research, Medical Research Council, NIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Family and Disability Support Research
4.61
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.