Coworking Spaces and Their Effects on Workers and Working Environments

This paper draws on a qualitative methodology, combining semi-structured interviews with thematic analysis, to examine the benefits and limitations of working conditions in coworking spaces. It also explores the hypothesis that such environments foster creativity and innovation, a claim often associated with the theory of open innovation and the context of open spaces, as are often found in coworking spaces. The findings reveal that collaboration is neither universally pursued nor spontaneously realized among coworkers. Rather, it appears to depend on the presence of a facilitator who actively promotes interaction and knowledge exchange. Physical conditions—such as noise, distractions, or spatial layout—can hinder productivity for some, while others adjust with ease. The study underscores the diversity of coworking experiences, particularly in non-metropolitan areas where empirical research remains limited, thereby making a significant contribution to the field. Beyond its theoretical insights into creativity and innovation, the research offers practical guidance for coworking space facilitators and community managers aiming to cultivate more collaborative and productive environments.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Open Journal of Social Sciences
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4236/jss.2025.137026
Primary Topic
Facilities and Workplace Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Coworking Spaces and Their Effects on Workers and Working Environments

Diane‐Gabrielle Tremblay
Open Journal of Social Sciences
Facilities and Workplace Management
article

Coworking Spaces and Their Effects on Workers and Working Environments

Diane‐Gabrielle Tremblay
article en

Abstract

This paper draws on a qualitative methodology, combining semi-structured interviews with thematic analysis, to examine the benefits and limitations of working conditions in coworking spaces. It also explores the hypothesis that such environments foster creativity and innovation, a claim often associated with the theory of open innovation and the context of open spaces, as are often found in coworking spaces. The findings reveal that collaboration is neither universally pursued nor spontaneously realized among coworkers. Rather, it appears to depend on the presence of a facilitator who actively promotes interaction and knowledge exchange. Physical conditions—such as noise, distractions, or spatial layout—can hinder productivity for some, while others adjust with ease. The study underscores the diversity of coworking experiences, particularly in non-metropolitan areas where empirical research remains limited, thereby making a significant contribution to the field. Beyond its theoretical insights into creativity and innovation, the research offers practical guidance for coworking space facilitators and community managers aiming to cultivate more collaborative and productive environments.

Open Journal of Social SciencesVol. 13(07)
Université TÉLUQ (CA)
Institut de Recherche Robert-Sauvé en Santé et en Sécurité du Travail
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 79%
Facilities and Workplace Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.