Multiscale End-point Screening with Extended Tight-binding Hamiltonians

Background: Extended tight-binding (xTB) methods offer a computationally efficient alternative to classical force fields and ab initio quantum methods in modeling molecular systems. In the context of end-point free energy calculations, integrating xTB with implicit solvation models provides a promising route for enhanced accuracy. However, systematic benchmarking of xTB-based protocols remains limited, particularly in diverse host-guest systems. Methods: We investigated the integration of xTB Hamiltonians (GFN0, GFN1, and GFN2) with post-simulation implicit-solvent models [Poisson−Boltzmann (PB), generalized Born (GB), and the most recent CPCM-X] for end-point free energy calculations. A total of over 250 host-guest complexes were used, covering cucurbiturils, octa acids, and pillararenes. Both single-trajectory and three-trajectory sampling protocols were applied. Entropic contributions were estimated via MM-based normal mode analysis and xTB-based statistical approximations. We evaluated predictive performance using Kendall τ, Pearson r, and predictive index. Results: The three-trajectory protocol consistently outperformed the single-trajectory counterpart across Hamiltonians and solvent models. Among all configurations, the GFN2-xTB/PB combination showed the best predictive accuracy, although it fell short of the top-performing MM/GBOBCSA ΔG method. Notably, in challenging systems like sulfur-substituted pillararenes, xTB methods exhibited superior performance, whereas MM/GBSA failed due to inadequate error cancellation. The use of CPCM-X did not further enhance accuracy, possibly due to unsuccessful error cancellation. Conclusions: While MM/GBSA remains the most robust protocol for general use, the GFN2-xTB/PB ΔH method emerges as a viable alternative for cases where MM-based methods perform poorly. These findings highlight the value of xTB-based multiscale approaches for receptor-ligand binding, especially in complex or chemically diverse systems.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
BIO Integration
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.15212/bioi-2025-0071
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Advanced Electron Microscopy Techniques and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
12.74

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Multiscale End-point Screening with Extended Tight-binding Hamiltonians

Zuo-Yuan Zhang, Xiaohui Wang, Lijun Qiu, Zhaoxi Sun et al.
5 citations
BIO Integration
Advanced Electron Microscopy Techniques and Applications
12.74
article

Multiscale End-point Screening with Extended Tight-binding Hamiltonians

Zuo-Yuan Zhang, Xiaohui Wang, Lijun Qiu, Zhaoxi Sun, Sai Li
article en
5 citations

Abstract

Background: Extended tight-binding (xTB) methods offer a computationally efficient alternative to classical force fields and ab initio quantum methods in modeling molecular systems. In the context of end-point free energy calculations, integrating xTB with implicit solvation models provides a promising route for enhanced accuracy. However, systematic benchmarking of xTB-based protocols remains limited, particularly in diverse host-guest systems. Methods: We investigated the integration of xTB Hamiltonians (GFN0, GFN1, and GFN2) with post-simulation implicit-solvent models [Poisson−Boltzmann (PB), generalized Born (GB), and the most recent CPCM-X] for end-point free energy calculations. A total of over 250 host-guest complexes were used, covering cucurbiturils, octa acids, and pillararenes. Both single-trajectory and three-trajectory sampling protocols were applied. Entropic contributions were estimated via MM-based normal mode analysis and xTB-based statistical approximations. We evaluated predictive performance using Kendall τ, Pearson r, and predictive index. Results: The three-trajectory protocol consistently outperformed the single-trajectory counterpart across Hamiltonians and solvent models. Among all configurations, the GFN2-xTB/PB combination showed the best predictive accuracy, although it fell short of the top-performing MM/GBOBCSA ΔG method. Notably, in challenging systems like sulfur-substituted pillararenes, xTB methods exhibited superior performance, whereas MM/GBSA failed due to inadequate error cancellation. The use of CPCM-X did not further enhance accuracy, possibly due to unsuccessful error cancellation. Conclusions: While MM/GBSA remains the most robust protocol for general use, the GFN2-xTB/PB ΔH method emerges as a viable alternative for cases where MM-based methods perform poorly. These findings highlight the value of xTB-based multiscale approaches for receptor-ligand binding, especially in complex or chemically diverse systems.

BIO IntegrationVol. 6(1)
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Advanced Electron Microscopy Techniques and Applications
12.74
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.