Initial Comparison of Routine Electroencephalography and Event-Related Potentials in Patients with Cognitive Complaints
Routine electroencephalograms (EEGs) assess brain function, but can be time-consuming, resource-intensive and setting-restrictive. Brain vital signs (BVS) evaluation, derived from EEG-based event-related potentials (ERPs), offers a rapid, standardized evaluation of cognitive function. In this study, 20 outpatients with cognitive complaints underwent both routine EEGs and BVS evaluation. While only 4 participants showed abnormal EEG results, 11 had at least one of the six BVS out-of-range, suggesting increased sensitivity to cognitive impairment. This commentary discusses the feasibility and potential value of standardized BVS evaluation as a simple objective method for cognitive function evaluation.
Authors
- Ryan C.N. D’Arcy (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9091-2633)
- Tory O. Frizzell
- Kaitlin A. Harding (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0438-5764)
- Xiaowei Song (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9589-2520)
- George Medvedev (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9941-876X)
- Margit Glashutter (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4227-1867)
- Eric D. Kirby
Institutions
- Royal Columbian Hospital (CA)
- University of British Columbia (CA)
- Fraser Health (CA)
- Simon Fraser University (CA)
- Centre for Advancing Health Outcomes (CA)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences / Journal Canadien des Sciences Neurologiques
- Published
- 2025-07-24
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1017/cjn.2025.10362
- Primary Topic
- EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00