Multiple Routes to Progress in Model-Based Economics

Abstract This article examines whether characteristic modeling practices in economics lead to progress, that is, improved explanations and predictions. We question the widespread assumption that progress in modeling occurs solely through successive vertical refinements toward a single “best” model. Instead, we propose that progress can occur through multiple pathways. Specifically, we identify five distinct horizontal paths to progress: increased isolation of causal factors, differentiation of targets and purposes, derivation of robust theorems, multiplication of inconsistent perspectival models, and exploration of novel possibilities. We argue that these pathways, when properly constrained, increase explanatory and predictive power and therefore lead to scientific progress.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Philosophy of Science
Published
2025-07-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/psa.2025.10095
Primary Topic
Economic theories and models
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Multiple Routes to Progress in Model-Based Economics

Caterina Marchionni, Till Grüne‐Yanoff
Philosophy of Science
Economic theories and models
article

Multiple Routes to Progress in Model-Based Economics

Caterina Marchionni, Till Grüne‐Yanoff
article en

Abstract

Abstract This article examines whether characteristic modeling practices in economics lead to progress, that is, improved explanations and predictions. We question the widespread assumption that progress in modeling occurs solely through successive vertical refinements toward a single “best” model. Instead, we propose that progress can occur through multiple pathways. Specifically, we identify five distinct horizontal paths to progress: increased isolation of causal factors, differentiation of targets and purposes, derivation of robust theorems, multiplication of inconsistent perspectival models, and exploration of novel possibilities. We argue that these pathways, when properly constrained, increase explanatory and predictive power and therefore lead to scientific progress.

Philosophy of Science
University of Helsinki (FI), University of Milan (IT), KTH Royal Institute of Technology (SE)
University of Cambridge, University of Oxford, Stanford Bio-X
Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
Economic theories and models
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.