Effective deoccupation: Towards Responsible Guardianship of Nature

The doctrine of effective occupation was developed by colonial powers to justify their sovereignty over newly annexed territories and was measured by animus occupandi, the will to be sovereign; and corpus occupandi, the exercise of sovereignty, both specified by the colonizers themselves. While effective occupation over humans ended through the global decolonization movement, it remains the default for nature under the doctrines of Permanent Sovereignty over Natural Resources (PSNR) and the resourcist interpretation of Common Heritage of Mankind (CHM). Here I contend that nature still suffers the harms of colonialism through dispossession, exploitation, and domination. I propose a transition to effective deoccupation, measured by animus deoccupandi (the will to cultivate a well-informed, attentive and respectful relationship with nature), and corpus deoccupandi (the replacement of PSNR and CHM with Responsible Guardianship, with states as fiduciaries of planetary nature). I offer a preliminary sketch of what this would require, address objections, and conclude.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Political Philosophy
Published
2025-07-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.16995/pp.23671
Primary Topic
Reproductive Health and Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effective deoccupation: Towards Responsible Guardianship of Nature

Alejandra López Mancilla
Political Philosophy
Reproductive Health and Technologies
article

Effective deoccupation: Towards Responsible Guardianship of Nature

Alejandra López Mancilla
article en

Abstract

The doctrine of effective occupation was developed by colonial powers to justify their sovereignty over newly annexed territories and was measured by animus occupandi, the will to be sovereign; and corpus occupandi, the exercise of sovereignty, both specified by the colonizers themselves. While effective occupation over humans ended through the global decolonization movement, it remains the default for nature under the doctrines of Permanent Sovereignty over Natural Resources (PSNR) and the resourcist interpretation of Common Heritage of Mankind (CHM). Here I contend that nature still suffers the harms of colonialism through dispossession, exploitation, and domination. I propose a transition to effective deoccupation, measured by animus deoccupandi (the will to cultivate a well-informed, attentive and respectful relationship with nature), and corpus deoccupandi (the replacement of PSNR and CHM with Responsible Guardianship, with states as fiduciaries of planetary nature). I offer a preliminary sketch of what this would require, address objections, and conclude.

Political PhilosophyVol. 2(2)
University of Oslo (NO)
Openalex Percentile: Top 75%
Reproductive Health and Technologies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.