Efficacy of the spatial repellent SC Johnson Mosquito Shield™ against anophelines in free-flight chambers, semi-field systems, experimental huts, and in-home tests

Background Evaluation of vector control tools follows a phased approach, progressing from laboratory studies to semi-field trials in experimental huts, and finally to small-scale (in-home test) and large-scale (randomized control trials) field evaluations under user conditions. Method selection depends on the specific data objectives. Methods We assessed the entomological efficacy of the transfluthrin-based spatial repellent product SC Johnson Mosquito Shield™ in free-flight chambers, semi-field and field experimental hut trials, and an in-home test against Afrotropical malaria vectors. We focused on efficacy endpoints and mosquito collection methods to inform evidence-based evaluation of spatial repellents. Results Mosquito Shield reduced number of mosquitoes blood-feeding and landing, and also induced mortality, exophily, and deterrence at different magnitudes across the testing methods. However, not all endpoints were measurable with every method. Landing reductions were measured using human landing catches and remained similar in magnitude across experimental hut tests in the semi-field (71%) and field (70%), as well as in-home tests (66%), but were higher in the free-flight chambers (96%) using a susceptible mosquito strain. Other endpoints (mortality, and exophily) generally showed higher estimates in controlled environments with lab-reared mosquitoes, compared to ambient conditions with wild, free-flying mosquitoes. Conclusion This study supports the use of multiple test methods to generate entomological efficacy data required for country registrations, WHO prequalification dossiers, and post-deployment monitoring. The findings highlight the strengths and limitations of free-flight chambers, semi-field systems, experimental huts, and in-home tests in generating efficacy data for new spatial repellent products. These results support integration of Mosquito Shield into malaria vector control programs pending further operational evaluation. Mosquito landing reduction estimated via human landing catches is a reliable metric for monitoring spatial repellent product longevity across efficacy testing methods. The efficacy gradient between controlled and ambient conditions highlights the importance of testing under realistic settings before public health deployment.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Malaria
Published
2025-07-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fmala.2025.1621965
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Insect and Pesticide Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.67
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Efficacy of the spatial repellent SC Johnson Mosquito Shield™ against anophelines in free-flight chambers, semi-field systems, experimental huts, and in-home tests

T. M. Mascari, Antony Pius Mseka, Madeleine Chura, Sarah Moore et al.
1 citations
Frontiers in Malaria
Insect and Pesticide Research
1.67
article

Efficacy of the spatial repellent SC Johnson Mosquito Shield™ against anophelines in free-flight chambers, semi-field systems, experimental huts, and in-home tests

T. M. Mascari, Antony Pius Mseka, Madeleine Chura, Sarah Moore, Noely Otto Makungwa, Watson Ntabaliba, Hassan Ngonyani, Ahmadi Bakari Mpelepele, Johnson Kyeba Swai, Jason D. Moore, Saphina H. Ngoyani, Ibrahim S. Kibwengo
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Background Evaluation of vector control tools follows a phased approach, progressing from laboratory studies to semi-field trials in experimental huts, and finally to small-scale (in-home test) and large-scale (randomized control trials) field evaluations under user conditions. Method selection depends on the specific data objectives. Methods We assessed the entomological efficacy of the transfluthrin-based spatial repellent product SC Johnson Mosquito Shield™ in free-flight chambers, semi-field and field experimental hut trials, and an in-home test against Afrotropical malaria vectors. We focused on efficacy endpoints and mosquito collection methods to inform evidence-based evaluation of spatial repellents. Results Mosquito Shield reduced number of mosquitoes blood-feeding and landing, and also induced mortality, exophily, and deterrence at different magnitudes across the testing methods. However, not all endpoints were measurable with every method. Landing reductions were measured using human landing catches and remained similar in magnitude across experimental hut tests in the semi-field (71%) and field (70%), as well as in-home tests (66%), but were higher in the free-flight chambers (96%) using a susceptible mosquito strain. Other endpoints (mortality, and exophily) generally showed higher estimates in controlled environments with lab-reared mosquitoes, compared to ambient conditions with wild, free-flying mosquitoes. Conclusion This study supports the use of multiple test methods to generate entomological efficacy data required for country registrations, WHO prequalification dossiers, and post-deployment monitoring. The findings highlight the strengths and limitations of free-flight chambers, semi-field systems, experimental huts, and in-home tests in generating efficacy data for new spatial repellent products. These results support integration of Mosquito Shield into malaria vector control programs pending further operational evaluation. Mosquito landing reduction estimated via human landing catches is a reliable metric for monitoring spatial repellent product longevity across efficacy testing methods. The efficacy gradient between controlled and ambient conditions highlights the importance of testing under realistic settings before public health deployment.

Frontiers in MalariaVol. 3
Ifakara Health Institute (TZ), Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute (CH), University of Basel (CH), SC Johnson (United States) (US), Nelson Mandela African Institution of Science and Technology (TZ)
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Insect and Pesticide Research
1.67
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.