The evolution of design aesthetics using the example of postage stamp design in China
The author examines the aesthetic evolution of Chinese postage stamps, tracing the connection between traditional cultural elements and modern design trends. The study covers the period from the first "Big Dragon" stamps in 1878 through the revolutionary changes of 1911 to the post-war era, highlighting how stamps reflect China's cultural and political transformations. The research focuses on the harmony of form and content, as well as the synthesis of historical traditions and contemporary design. Using historical, visual, and comparative analysis, the author provides a fresh perspective on the aesthetics of stamp design, a topic that remains underexplored in academic research. A unique aspect of the study is the use of Chinese literary sources, offering an original approach to understanding the evolution of stamp design. The findings reveal that Chinese postage stamps are not merely functional objects but also cultural artifacts that encapsulate national identity and historical memory. They reflect the impact of government reforms, economic shifts, and changing visual aesthetics, serving as a medium for preserving and transmitting cultural heritage. The study concludes that stamps are a valuable resource for understanding the interplay between tradition and modernity in Chinese design, offering insights into the country's historical and cultural evolution. By analyzing the artistic language of stamps, the research demonstrates their role as both artistic expressions and historical documents, bridging the past and present in China's visual culture. This work contributes to the broader understanding of how design aesthetics evolve in response to societal changes, making it a significant addition to the fields of cultural and design studies.
Authors
- Shan Hou
Publication Details
- Journal
- Культура и искусство
- Published
- 2025-05-01
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.7256/2454-0625.2025.5.73589
- Primary Topic
- Digital Media and Visual Art
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00