Reassessing the Financial Trilemma: A Mixed Methods Analysis of Its Impact on Financial Governance in Zimbabwean Banks (2010-2024)

A comprehensive reassessment of the financial trilemma's applicability to the governance of banking systems in peripheral economies has been conducted through a mixed methods investigation focused on Zimbabwe between 2010 and 2024.Despite the trilemma's prominence in international financial theory-emphasising the trade-off among financial integration, monetary policy autonomy, and financial stability-its limitations in structurally fragile, postcolonial contexts have remained underexplored.This gap has been addressed by integrating descriptive statistical analysis of 45 archival policy documents with narrative insights derived from 130 semi-structured interviews conducted with risk managers in commercial banking institutions.Analytical triangulation was achieved through the application of Marxist immanent critique, revealing the embedded ideological assumptions underpinning traditional trilemma theory.Findings indicate that when deployed in politically unstable and externally dependent contexts, the trilemma model inadvertently reinforces global financial dependency, entrenched class domination, and extractive policy frameworks.These dynamics have been shown to undermine domestic policy sovereignty and institutional resilience, thereby constraining effective financial governance.Moreover, technocratic framings of the trilemma have been found to obscure its alignment with neoliberal orthodoxies, including financialisation, commodification, elite resource capture, and the enclosure of domestic financial spaces.These processes have facilitated the appropriation of national resources under the guise of liberalisation, revealing the inadequacy of applying conventional trilemma logic in structurally asymmetrical settings.It is therefore proposed that financial governance in such contexts be reconceptualised through heterodox approaches grounded in regional solidarity, decolonisation of international finance, participatory governance mechanisms, and the strategic use of capital controls.The study contributes to the retheorisation of financial governance in developing economies by challenging the ideological neutrality of mainstream economic models and proposing context-sensitive alternatives better suited to postcolonial realities.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Accounting Finance and Auditing Studies
Published
2025-06-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.56578/jafas110203
Primary Topic
African studies and sociopolitical issues
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Reassessing the Financial Trilemma: A Mixed Methods Analysis of Its Impact on Financial Governance in Zimbabwean Banks (2010-2024)

Gilbert Tepetepe
Journal of Accounting Finance and Auditing Studies
African studies and sociopolitical issues
article

Reassessing the Financial Trilemma: A Mixed Methods Analysis of Its Impact on Financial Governance in Zimbabwean Banks (2010-2024)

Gilbert Tepetepe
article en

Abstract

A comprehensive reassessment of the financial trilemma's applicability to the governance of banking systems in peripheral economies has been conducted through a mixed methods investigation focused on Zimbabwe between 2010 and 2024.Despite the trilemma's prominence in international financial theory-emphasising the trade-off among financial integration, monetary policy autonomy, and financial stability-its limitations in structurally fragile, postcolonial contexts have remained underexplored.This gap has been addressed by integrating descriptive statistical analysis of 45 archival policy documents with narrative insights derived from 130 semi-structured interviews conducted with risk managers in commercial banking institutions.Analytical triangulation was achieved through the application of Marxist immanent critique, revealing the embedded ideological assumptions underpinning traditional trilemma theory.Findings indicate that when deployed in politically unstable and externally dependent contexts, the trilemma model inadvertently reinforces global financial dependency, entrenched class domination, and extractive policy frameworks.These dynamics have been shown to undermine domestic policy sovereignty and institutional resilience, thereby constraining effective financial governance.Moreover, technocratic framings of the trilemma have been found to obscure its alignment with neoliberal orthodoxies, including financialisation, commodification, elite resource capture, and the enclosure of domestic financial spaces.These processes have facilitated the appropriation of national resources under the guise of liberalisation, revealing the inadequacy of applying conventional trilemma logic in structurally asymmetrical settings.It is therefore proposed that financial governance in such contexts be reconceptualised through heterodox approaches grounded in regional solidarity, decolonisation of international finance, participatory governance mechanisms, and the strategic use of capital controls.The study contributes to the retheorisation of financial governance in developing economies by challenging the ideological neutrality of mainstream economic models and proposing context-sensitive alternatives better suited to postcolonial realities.

Journal of Accounting Finance and Auditing StudiesVol. 11(2)
University of Johannesburg (ZA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 75%
African studies and sociopolitical issues
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.