Comparison of Fiber Optic Accelerometers and Conventional Geophones in Field Testing for Seismic Exploration

Summary This study compares fiber-optic accelerometers with conventional geophones during field tests at an onshore oilfield survey. Results show near-identical time-domain waveforms, with cross-correlation coefficients exceeding 0.89 for active-source signals. Spectral analysis shows that the FOA has lower self-noise than conventional sensors below 3 Hz, and the sensitivity in the range of 16 Hz∼40 Hz is higher. This reflects the potential advantages of fiber detectors in deep target imaging and shallow high-resolution stratigraphic characterization.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3997/2214-4609.202574026
Primary Topic
Geophysics and Sensor Technology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of Fiber Optic Accelerometers and Conventional Geophones in Field Testing for Seismic Exploration

Qi Gao, Wenzhu Huang, Yi Luo, Kun Zhu et al.
Geophysics and Sensor Technology
article

Comparison of Fiber Optic Accelerometers and Conventional Geophones in Field Testing for Seismic Exploration

Qi Gao, Wenzhu Huang, Yi Luo, Kun Zhu, Wentao Zhang
article en

Abstract

Summary This study compares fiber-optic accelerometers with conventional geophones during field tests at an onshore oilfield survey. Results show near-identical time-domain waveforms, with cross-correlation coefficients exceeding 0.89 for active-source signals. Spectral analysis shows that the FOA has lower self-noise than conventional sensors below 3 Hz, and the sensitivity in the range of 16 Hz∼40 Hz is higher. This reflects the potential advantages of fiber detectors in deep target imaging and shallow high-resolution stratigraphic characterization.

Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN), Institute of Semiconductors (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 78%
Geophysics and Sensor Technology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.