Timing matters! Academic assessment changes throughout the day

The influence of timing on decision-making processes has garnered significant attention across various domains, yet its impact on academic assessment remains under investigated. While previous research has suggested time-of-day effects on judicial decisions, methodological limitations have restricted the generalizability of these findings. Here, we present a comprehensive analysis of 104.552 oral exams conducted at an Italian university, revealing a robust relationship between exam timing and academic outcomes. Our results demonstrate a Gaussian distribution of passing rates throughout the day, with a significant peak at midday. This pattern persists after controlling for exam difficulty and other potential confounding factors, suggesting an intrinsic time-dependent bias in the evaluation process. Our findings not only corroborate previous research on the influence of timing on decision-making but also extend it to the realm of academic assessment. These results have profound implications for educational policy and practice, highlighting the need for strategic exam scheduling to optimize student performance and ensure equitable evaluation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Psychology
Published
2025-07-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1605041
Primary Topic
School Choice and Performance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Timing matters! Academic assessment changes throughout the day

Massimo Mucciardi, Mohammad Ali Salehinejad, Chiara Lucifora, Pietro Perconti et al.
Frontiers in Psychology
School Choice and Performance
article

Timing matters! Academic assessment changes throughout the day

Massimo Mucciardi, Mohammad Ali Salehinejad, Chiara Lucifora, Pietro Perconti, Simona Massimino, Michael A. Nitsche, Alessio Avenanti, Francesco Tomaiuolo, Carmelo M. Vicario
article en

Abstract

The influence of timing on decision-making processes has garnered significant attention across various domains, yet its impact on academic assessment remains under investigated. While previous research has suggested time-of-day effects on judicial decisions, methodological limitations have restricted the generalizability of these findings. Here, we present a comprehensive analysis of 104.552 oral exams conducted at an Italian university, revealing a robust relationship between exam timing and academic outcomes. Our results demonstrate a Gaussian distribution of passing rates throughout the day, with a significant peak at midday. This pattern persists after controlling for exam difficulty and other potential confounding factors, suggesting an intrinsic time-dependent bias in the evaluation process. Our findings not only corroborate previous research on the influence of timing on decision-making but also extend it to the realm of academic assessment. These results have profound implications for educational policy and practice, highlighting the need for strategic exam scheduling to optimize student performance and ensure equitable evaluation.

Frontiers in PsychologyVol. 16
University of Messina (IT), TU Dortmund University (DE), Catholic University of the Maule (CL), Azienda-Unita' Sanitaria Locale Di Cesena (IT), Institute for Research in Fundamental Sciences (IR), Leibniz Research Centre for Working Environment and Human Factors (DE), RWTH Aachen University (DE), University of Bologna (IT)
Università degli Studi di Messina
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 80%
School Choice and Performance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.