Comparison of Warm Sitz Bath and Ice Therapy for Postoperative Management After Hemorrhoidectomy

Background: Hemorrhoidectomy is a common surgical procedure for grade 3 and 4 hemorrhoids, often associated with significant postoperative pain and wound healing challenges. This study aimed to compare the efficacy of warm sitz bath and ice therapy in postoperative pain management and wound healing after hemorrhoidectomy. Methods: A prospective comparative study was conducted at KLE Co-operative Hospital and affiliated KAHER institutes in Hubballi, North Karnataka. One hundred twenty patients (60 in each group) aged 18-75 years with grade 3 or 4 external hemorrhoids undergoing Ferguson's hemorrhoidectomy were randomized to receive either warm sitz bath or ice therapy postoperatively. Pain was assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), and wound healing was evaluated using the REEDA scale (Redness, Edema, Ecchymosis, Discharge, Approximation) at 24 hours, 3 days, 7 days, and 14 days postoperatively. Secondary outcomes included analgesic consumption, patient satisfaction, and time to return to normal activities. Results: Patients in the ice therapy group experienced significantly lower pain scores at 24 hours (mean VAS: 5.2±1.3 vs. 6.8±1.5, p<0.001) and 3 days (mean VAS: 3.8±1.1 vs. 4.9±1.3, p<0.001) compared to the sitz bath group. However, the sitz bath group demonstrated better wound healing parameters at 7 days (mean REEDA score: 3.1±0.9 vs. 4.2±1.1, p<0.001) and 14 days (mean REEDA score: 1.2±0.6 vs. 2.3±0.8, p<0.001). Analgesic consumption was significantly lower in the ice therapy group during the first 3 days (p=0.002), while patient satisfaction scores were comparable between groups at the end of the follow-up period (p=0.346). Conclusion: Ice therapy provides superior early postoperative pain control and reduces analgesic requirements following hemorrhoidectomy, while warm sitz bath promotes better wound healing in the later recovery phase. A sequential approach of ice therapy in the immediate postoperative period followed by warm sitz bath after 3-4 days may optimize both pain management and wound healing outcomes

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Neonatal Surgery
Published
2025-03-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.63682/jns.v14i32s.8403
Primary Topic
Pain Management and Placebo Effect
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of Warm Sitz Bath and Ice Therapy for Postoperative Management After Hemorrhoidectomy

Prafullachandra Hoogar, Praveen Kumar K H, Sachin Kanakapur, Sanjeev R Navalyal
Journal of Neonatal Surgery
Pain Management and Placebo Effect
article

Comparison of Warm Sitz Bath and Ice Therapy for Postoperative Management After Hemorrhoidectomy

Prafullachandra Hoogar, Praveen Kumar K H, Sachin Kanakapur, Sanjeev R Navalyal
article en

Abstract

Background: Hemorrhoidectomy is a common surgical procedure for grade 3 and 4 hemorrhoids, often associated with significant postoperative pain and wound healing challenges. This study aimed to compare the efficacy of warm sitz bath and ice therapy in postoperative pain management and wound healing after hemorrhoidectomy. Methods: A prospective comparative study was conducted at KLE Co-operative Hospital and affiliated KAHER institutes in Hubballi, North Karnataka. One hundred twenty patients (60 in each group) aged 18-75 years with grade 3 or 4 external hemorrhoids undergoing Ferguson's hemorrhoidectomy were randomized to receive either warm sitz bath or ice therapy postoperatively. Pain was assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), and wound healing was evaluated using the REEDA scale (Redness, Edema, Ecchymosis, Discharge, Approximation) at 24 hours, 3 days, 7 days, and 14 days postoperatively. Secondary outcomes included analgesic consumption, patient satisfaction, and time to return to normal activities. Results: Patients in the ice therapy group experienced significantly lower pain scores at 24 hours (mean VAS: 5.2±1.3 vs. 6.8±1.5, p<0.001) and 3 days (mean VAS: 3.8±1.1 vs. 4.9±1.3, p<0.001) compared to the sitz bath group. However, the sitz bath group demonstrated better wound healing parameters at 7 days (mean REEDA score: 3.1±0.9 vs. 4.2±1.1, p<0.001) and 14 days (mean REEDA score: 1.2±0.6 vs. 2.3±0.8, p<0.001). Analgesic consumption was significantly lower in the ice therapy group during the first 3 days (p=0.002), while patient satisfaction scores were comparable between groups at the end of the follow-up period (p=0.346). Conclusion: Ice therapy provides superior early postoperative pain control and reduces analgesic requirements following hemorrhoidectomy, while warm sitz bath promotes better wound healing in the later recovery phase. A sequential approach of ice therapy in the immediate postoperative period followed by warm sitz bath after 3-4 days may optimize both pain management and wound healing outcomes

Journal of Neonatal SurgeryVol. 14(32S)
Openalex Percentile: Top 82%
Pain Management and Placebo Effect
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.