What are youth refuge practice models and how effective are they in improving outcomes for youth experiencing homelessness? A systematic narrative review

Youth homelessness is a global problem. Preventing youth homelessness has many individual and societal benefits. Internationally, a key response to youth homelessness is the provision of a standard youth refuge model which includes short-term accommodation staffed by support workers who provide case management and referrals, with other varying health, hygiene and crisis services attached. However, it is unclear what is offered within these settings, and whether youth refuge improves any outcomes for youth experiencing homelessness. Homelessness services have also been increasingly encouraged to embed trauma-informed or psychologically informed practice models into service delivery. Like broader evaluations of the standard model, little is currently known about the extent to which these practice models are being implemented, how they are implemented, and whether they improve outcomes beyond standard models. Therefore, this systematic narrative review aimed to: (1) identify what services youth refuges provide, and which practice models are used; and (2) examine how effective youth refuge practice models are in improving health, behavioural, psychosocial, and/or housing outcomes for youth experiencing homelessness. Database and grey literature searches identified ten articles to be included. Seven articles evaluated a standard refuge model, two included strengths-based practice models, and one included an empowerment philosophy. No practice model offered evidence of its efficacy above what was offered by the standard refuge model, and limited detail about implementation of any model was found. Two cohorts emerged within refuge: (1) a younger cohort who could reconcile with family with therapeutic intervention; and (2) an older cohort who needed other options. Generally, results demonstrated short- to medium-term improvements in all health, wellbeing, and housing outcomes, with most gains reported in vocational status and improved family relations. Housing stability was a key contributing factor for outcome achievement. Most studies were of low methodological quality hence more rigorous, standardised, mixed-methods research is needed before conclusions about the efficacy of youth refuge and any practice models can be made.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Children and Youth Services Review
Published
2025-07-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2025.108487
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Homelessness and Social Issues
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

What are youth refuge practice models and how effective are they in improving outcomes for youth experiencing homelessness? A systematic narrative review

Rachael Green, Emma Galvin, Tatiana Corrales, Anda Jaman et al.
1 citations
Children and Youth Services Review
Homelessness and Social Issues
article

What are youth refuge practice models and how effective are they in improving outcomes for youth experiencing homelessness? A systematic narrative review

Rachael Green, Emma Galvin, Tatiana Corrales, Anda Jaman, Helen Skouteris, Claire Edmanson, Melissa Savaglio
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Youth homelessness is a global problem. Preventing youth homelessness has many individual and societal benefits. Internationally, a key response to youth homelessness is the provision of a standard youth refuge model which includes short-term accommodation staffed by support workers who provide case management and referrals, with other varying health, hygiene and crisis services attached. However, it is unclear what is offered within these settings, and whether youth refuge improves any outcomes for youth experiencing homelessness. Homelessness services have also been increasingly encouraged to embed trauma-informed or psychologically informed practice models into service delivery. Like broader evaluations of the standard model, little is currently known about the extent to which these practice models are being implemented, how they are implemented, and whether they improve outcomes beyond standard models. Therefore, this systematic narrative review aimed to: (1) identify what services youth refuges provide, and which practice models are used; and (2) examine how effective youth refuge practice models are in improving health, behavioural, psychosocial, and/or housing outcomes for youth experiencing homelessness. Database and grey literature searches identified ten articles to be included. Seven articles evaluated a standard refuge model, two included strengths-based practice models, and one included an empowerment philosophy. No practice model offered evidence of its efficacy above what was offered by the standard refuge model, and limited detail about implementation of any model was found. Two cohorts emerged within refuge: (1) a younger cohort who could reconcile with family with therapeutic intervention; and (2) an older cohort who needed other options. Generally, results demonstrated short- to medium-term improvements in all health, wellbeing, and housing outcomes, with most gains reported in vocational status and improved family relations. Housing stability was a key contributing factor for outcome achievement. Most studies were of low methodological quality hence more rigorous, standardised, mixed-methods research is needed before conclusions about the efficacy of youth refuge and any practice models can be made.

Children and Youth Services ReviewVol. 177
University of Warwick (GB), Monash Health (AU), Services Australia (AU), Monash University (AU)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Homelessness and Social Issues
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.