Differential responses of ground-nesting bees (Leioproctus paahaumaa and Lasioglossum spp.) to horticultural intensity and landscape factors

Habitat loss and increased pesticide use associated with intensified agriculture contribute to declines in wild bees. The vast majority of bee species worldwide are living below ground, yet their responses to agricultural practices are poorly understood. We surveyed New Zealand native ground-nesting bees ( Lasioglossum sordidum , Lasioglossum cognatum and Leioproctus paahaumaa ) in eight avocado orchards across a gradient of horticultural intensity. We examined how bee abundance related to pesticide use, land cover, soil hardness, and slope. Total bee abundance was negatively associated with slope, and positively associated with horticultural intensity and soil hardness. Lasioglossum sordidum were more abundant in high intensity horticultural areas, but declined with higher pesticide use. In contrast, although L. paahaumaa abundance was highest in low intensity horticultural areas, their abundance was predicted best by models that only included slope and soil hardness. No significant predictors were identified for L. cognatum . These species-specific responses to landscape factors and farm management practices highlight the challenge of identifying agricultural practices that will support ground-nesting bees. Nevertheless, reducing pesticide use will promote at least L. sordidum populations and therefore facilitate the adoption of sustainable farming methods to enhance ecosystem health.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Global Ecology and Conservation
Published
2025-07-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gecco.2025.e03767
Primary Topic
Plant and animal studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Differential responses of ground-nesting bees (Leioproctus paahaumaa and Lasioglossum spp.) to horticultural intensity and landscape factors

Ashley N. Mortensen, Jacqueline R. Beggs, David E. Pattemore, Felicia Kueh-Tai
Global Ecology and Conservation
Plant and animal studies
article

Differential responses of ground-nesting bees (Leioproctus paahaumaa and Lasioglossum spp.) to horticultural intensity and landscape factors

Ashley N. Mortensen, Jacqueline R. Beggs, David E. Pattemore, Felicia Kueh-Tai
article en

Abstract

Habitat loss and increased pesticide use associated with intensified agriculture contribute to declines in wild bees. The vast majority of bee species worldwide are living below ground, yet their responses to agricultural practices are poorly understood. We surveyed New Zealand native ground-nesting bees ( Lasioglossum sordidum , Lasioglossum cognatum and Leioproctus paahaumaa ) in eight avocado orchards across a gradient of horticultural intensity. We examined how bee abundance related to pesticide use, land cover, soil hardness, and slope. Total bee abundance was negatively associated with slope, and positively associated with horticultural intensity and soil hardness. Lasioglossum sordidum were more abundant in high intensity horticultural areas, but declined with higher pesticide use. In contrast, although L. paahaumaa abundance was highest in low intensity horticultural areas, their abundance was predicted best by models that only included slope and soil hardness. No significant predictors were identified for L. cognatum . These species-specific responses to landscape factors and farm management practices highlight the challenge of identifying agricultural practices that will support ground-nesting bees. Nevertheless, reducing pesticide use will promote at least L. sordidum populations and therefore facilitate the adoption of sustainable farming methods to enhance ecosystem health.

Global Ecology and ConservationVol. 62
University of Auckland (NZ), Unitec Institute of Technology (NZ)
New Zealand Institute for Plant and Food Research Limited, University of Auckland, Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment, Serono Symposia International Foundation
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 85%
Plant and animal studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.