Numerical simulation of reacting and non-reacting liquid jets in supersonic crossflow

Canonical jet in supersonic crossflow (JISC) studies have been widely used to study fundamental physics relevant to a variety of applications. While most JISC works have considered injection of gases, liquid injection is also of practical interest and introduces additional multi-scale physics, such as atomization and evaporation, that complicate the flow dynamics. To facilitate further understanding of these complex phenomena, this work presents multiphase simulations of reacting and non-reacting JISC configurations with freestream Mach numbers of roughly 4.5. Adaptive mesh refinement is implemented with a volume of fluid scheme to capture the liquid breakup and turbulent mixing at high resolution. The results compare the effects of the jet momentum ratio and freestream temperature on the jet penetration, mixing, and combustion dynamics. For similar jet momentum ratios, the jet penetration and mixing characteristics are similar for the reacting and non-reacting cases. Mixing analyses reveal that vorticity and turbulent kinetic energy (TKE) intensities peak in the jet shear layers, where vortex stretching is the dominant turbulence-generation mechanism for all cases. Cases with lower freestream temperatures yield negligible heat release, while cases with elevated freestream temperatures exhibit chemical reactions primarily along the leading bow shock and within the boundary layer in the jet wake. The evaporative cooling quenches the chemical reactions in the primary atomization zone at the injection height, such that the flow rates of several product species plateau after x / d = 20 . Substantial concentrations of final product species are only observed along the bow shock—due to locally elevated temperature and pressure—and in the boundary layer far downstream—where lower flow velocities counteract the effects of prolonged ignition delays. This combination of factors leads to low combustion efficiency at the domain exit. • Reacting and non-reacting jet in supersonic crossflow simulations are presented. • Volume of fluid formulation allows fuel atomization and evaporation to be captured. • Vorticity and turbulent energy peak in jet shear layers and atomization zones. • Reactions are heightened in bow shock and boundary layer but quenched in jet wake. • Low combustion efficiencies are attributed to prolonged ignition delays.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Applications in Energy and Combustion Science
Published
2025-07-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaecs.2025.100353
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Computational Fluid Dynamics and Aerodynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.67
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Numerical simulation of reacting and non-reacting liquid jets in supersonic crossflow

Venkat Raman, Michael Ullman, Shivank Sharma
2 citations
Applications in Energy and Combustion Science
Computational Fluid Dynamics and Aerodynamics
2.67
article

Numerical simulation of reacting and non-reacting liquid jets in supersonic crossflow

Venkat Raman, Michael Ullman, Shivank Sharma
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Canonical jet in supersonic crossflow (JISC) studies have been widely used to study fundamental physics relevant to a variety of applications. While most JISC works have considered injection of gases, liquid injection is also of practical interest and introduces additional multi-scale physics, such as atomization and evaporation, that complicate the flow dynamics. To facilitate further understanding of these complex phenomena, this work presents multiphase simulations of reacting and non-reacting JISC configurations with freestream Mach numbers of roughly 4.5. Adaptive mesh refinement is implemented with a volume of fluid scheme to capture the liquid breakup and turbulent mixing at high resolution. The results compare the effects of the jet momentum ratio and freestream temperature on the jet penetration, mixing, and combustion dynamics. For similar jet momentum ratios, the jet penetration and mixing characteristics are similar for the reacting and non-reacting cases. Mixing analyses reveal that vorticity and turbulent kinetic energy (TKE) intensities peak in the jet shear layers, where vortex stretching is the dominant turbulence-generation mechanism for all cases. Cases with lower freestream temperatures yield negligible heat release, while cases with elevated freestream temperatures exhibit chemical reactions primarily along the leading bow shock and within the boundary layer in the jet wake. The evaporative cooling quenches the chemical reactions in the primary atomization zone at the injection height, such that the flow rates of several product species plateau after x / d = 20 . Substantial concentrations of final product species are only observed along the bow shock—due to locally elevated temperature and pressure—and in the boundary layer far downstream—where lower flow velocities counteract the effects of prolonged ignition delays. This combination of factors leads to low combustion efficiency at the domain exit. • Reacting and non-reacting jet in supersonic crossflow simulations are presented. • Volume of fluid formulation allows fuel atomization and evaporation to be captured. • Vorticity and turbulent energy peak in jet shear layers and atomization zones. • Reactions are heightened in bow shock and boundary layer but quenched in jet wake. • Low combustion efficiencies are attributed to prolonged ignition delays.

Applications in Energy and Combustion ScienceVol. 23
University of Michigan (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Computational Fluid Dynamics and Aerodynamics
2.67
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.