Adoption of artificial intelligence in the judiciary: a comparison of 28 advanced democracies

Artificial Intelligence (AI) is increasingly used worldwide to make decisions, be it by public administrations, industry, banks, or insurers. One area with a particularly high impact on citizens is its use in judiciary processes. To this day, there has been little investigation into why countries decide to adopt AI in this area. In this article, we show that the mere promise of efficiency gains is not enough of an explanation for why countries adopt AI within judiciary processes. Instead, we show that the administrative burden (as measured by the number of days to trial), a government’s leaning within the political spectrum (namely towards the left), and the level of adoption of technology by governments in neighboring countries predict countries’ announcement to adopt AI in their judiciary. Taken together, our findings derived from a data analysis of 28 advanced democracies constitute an important step towards a better understanding of the factors shaping AI’s integration into judiciary processes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Discover Artificial Intelligence
Published
2025-07-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s44163-025-00311-y
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.73
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Adoption of artificial intelligence in the judiciary: a comparison of 28 advanced democracies

Simon Mayer, Markus Hinterleitner, Clement Guitton, Aurelia Tamò‐Larrieux et al.
2 citations
Discover Artificial Intelligence
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
4.73
article

Adoption of artificial intelligence in the judiciary: a comparison of 28 advanced democracies

Simon Mayer, Markus Hinterleitner, Clement Guitton, Aurelia Tamò‐Larrieux, Vlada Druta
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Artificial Intelligence (AI) is increasingly used worldwide to make decisions, be it by public administrations, industry, banks, or insurers. One area with a particularly high impact on citizens is its use in judiciary processes. To this day, there has been little investigation into why countries decide to adopt AI in this area. In this article, we show that the mere promise of efficiency gains is not enough of an explanation for why countries adopt AI within judiciary processes. Instead, we show that the administrative burden (as measured by the number of days to trial), a government’s leaning within the political spectrum (namely towards the left), and the level of adoption of technology by governments in neighboring countries predict countries’ announcement to adopt AI in their judiciary. Taken together, our findings derived from a data analysis of 28 advanced democracies constitute an important step towards a better understanding of the factors shaping AI’s integration into judiciary processes.

Discover Artificial IntelligenceVol. 5(1)
University of St.Gallen (CH), University of Lausanne (CH)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
4.73
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Adoption of artificial intelligence in the judiciary: a comparison of 28 advanced democracies — Simon Mayer, Markus Hinterleitner, et al. · Discover Artificial Intelligence (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS