Comparative Profitability of Plant and Ratoon Methods of Sugarcane Cultivation in Kamareddy District of Telangana, India

Aims: The study aimed to analyze and compare the cost of cultivation, profitability and farm income measures between fresh (plant) and ratoon sugarcane cultivation methods. Study Design: A comparative economic analysis was conducted using structured cost concepts and farm income indicators across both methods of sugarcane production. Place and Duration of Study: The study was conducted in Kamareddy district, Telangana, during the 2023–2024 cropping season. Methodology: Primary data were collected from a sample of 80 sugarcane farmers (40 plant crop and 40 ratoon sugarcane farmers) through personal interviews using a pre-tested schedule. The data was analyzed using cost concepts such as Cost A1, A2, B1, B2, C1, C2, and C3. Farm profitability was assessed through gross returns, net returns, cost of production per quintal, farm business income, family labour income, and farm investment income. Results: The total cost of cultivation was ₹2,57,936.66/ha for plant and ₹1,73,729.05/ha for ratoon sugarcane crop. Variable costs accounted for 93.4 per cent and 92.08 per cent of total costs respectively in plant and ratoon, where machine and human labour occupying major share. Cost concepts (A1 to C3) were consistently higher for plant cane. The Gross returns were also higher in plant sugarcane (₹3,57,102 /ha) than in ratoon cane (₹ 2,76,426/ha). However, ratoon sugarcane recorded a higher net income (₹1,02,696.94/ha), a lower cost of production (₹169.69/q), and a higher B:C ratio (1.59) when compared to plant cane, which had a net income of ₹99,165.33/ha, a higher cost of production (₹195.02/q), and a lower B:C ratio (1.38). Income indicators such as farm business income and family labour income were also slightly higher in ratoon cultivation. Conclusion: While plant sugarcane offers higher gross income due to superior yields, ratoon sugarcane provides better net returns, cost efficiency, and profitability. Thus, ratoon cropping is a more economically viable option under the studied production conditions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Archives of Current Research International
Published
2025-07-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.9734/acri/2025/v25i71381
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Sugarcane Cultivation and Processing
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.75
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative Profitability of Plant and Ratoon Methods of Sugarcane Cultivation in Kamareddy District of Telangana, India

P. Prashanth, B. Sowjanya, I. Shakuntala Devi, Vaishnavi Varala
1 citations
Archives of Current Research International
Sugarcane Cultivation and Processing
1.75
article

Comparative Profitability of Plant and Ratoon Methods of Sugarcane Cultivation in Kamareddy District of Telangana, India

P. Prashanth, B. Sowjanya, I. Shakuntala Devi, Vaishnavi Varala
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Aims: The study aimed to analyze and compare the cost of cultivation, profitability and farm income measures between fresh (plant) and ratoon sugarcane cultivation methods. Study Design: A comparative economic analysis was conducted using structured cost concepts and farm income indicators across both methods of sugarcane production. Place and Duration of Study: The study was conducted in Kamareddy district, Telangana, during the 2023–2024 cropping season. Methodology: Primary data were collected from a sample of 80 sugarcane farmers (40 plant crop and 40 ratoon sugarcane farmers) through personal interviews using a pre-tested schedule. The data was analyzed using cost concepts such as Cost A1, A2, B1, B2, C1, C2, and C3. Farm profitability was assessed through gross returns, net returns, cost of production per quintal, farm business income, family labour income, and farm investment income. Results: The total cost of cultivation was ₹2,57,936.66/ha for plant and ₹1,73,729.05/ha for ratoon sugarcane crop. Variable costs accounted for 93.4 per cent and 92.08 per cent of total costs respectively in plant and ratoon, where machine and human labour occupying major share. Cost concepts (A1 to C3) were consistently higher for plant cane. The Gross returns were also higher in plant sugarcane (₹3,57,102 /ha) than in ratoon cane (₹ 2,76,426/ha). However, ratoon sugarcane recorded a higher net income (₹1,02,696.94/ha), a lower cost of production (₹169.69/q), and a higher B:C ratio (1.59) when compared to plant cane, which had a net income of ₹99,165.33/ha, a higher cost of production (₹195.02/q), and a lower B:C ratio (1.38). Income indicators such as farm business income and family labour income were also slightly higher in ratoon cultivation. Conclusion: While plant sugarcane offers higher gross income due to superior yields, ratoon sugarcane provides better net returns, cost efficiency, and profitability. Thus, ratoon cropping is a more economically viable option under the studied production conditions.

Archives of Current Research InternationalVol. 25(7)
Professor Jayashankar Telangana Agricultural University (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Sugarcane Cultivation and Processing
1.75
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.