AUDITORS’ TENDENCY TO ISSUE GOING CONCERN OPINIONS: EVIDENCE FROM SERBIAN CAPITAL MARKET

This study investigates possible going concern issues in listed companies in the foreseeable future by analyzing the opinions presented in auditors’ reports covering the period 2021-2023. We use descriptive analysis to conclude that auditor reporting on going concern in the Republic of Serbia is below the level typical for developed economies. The dominant share of other audit firms, those outside the Big 4 group, and consequently the fear of legal costs and loss of reputation may be the reasons why auditors in most cases do not modify their going concern opinions. We analyze all paragraphs of the auditor’s report in which auditors point to the circumstances that caused the crisis in companies, and find that the most frequently mentioned indicators are net loss, accumulated loss and over-indebtedness. Furthermore, we include modified audit opinions based on other key issues in financial statements in the analysis, and conclude that the share of modifications is significantly above the average in developed economies. In this way, we further shed light on financial reporting in the Republic of Serbia and confirm that efforts to improve it are yet to come.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Facta Universitatis Series Economics and Organization
Published
2025-07-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.22190/fueo250218003s
Primary Topic
Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

AUDITORS’ TENDENCY TO ISSUE GOING CONCERN OPINIONS: EVIDENCE FROM SERBIAN CAPITAL MARKET

Jovana Stojanović
Facta Universitatis Series Economics and Organization
Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance
article

AUDITORS’ TENDENCY TO ISSUE GOING CONCERN OPINIONS: EVIDENCE FROM SERBIAN CAPITAL MARKET

Jovana Stojanović
article en

Abstract

This study investigates possible going concern issues in listed companies in the foreseeable future by analyzing the opinions presented in auditors’ reports covering the period 2021-2023. We use descriptive analysis to conclude that auditor reporting on going concern in the Republic of Serbia is below the level typical for developed economies. The dominant share of other audit firms, those outside the Big 4 group, and consequently the fear of legal costs and loss of reputation may be the reasons why auditors in most cases do not modify their going concern opinions. We analyze all paragraphs of the auditor’s report in which auditors point to the circumstances that caused the crisis in companies, and find that the most frequently mentioned indicators are net loss, accumulated loss and over-indebtedness. Furthermore, we include modified audit opinions based on other key issues in financial statements in the analysis, and conclude that the share of modifications is significantly above the average in developed economies. In this way, we further shed light on financial reporting in the Republic of Serbia and confirm that efforts to improve it are yet to come.

Facta Universitatis Series Economics and Organization
University of Nis (RS)
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.