Comparation between Thermochemical Hydrolysis and Microbial Fermentation in Bioethanol Production

This review compares third- and fourth-generation bioethanol production methods, focusing on thermochemical hydrolysis of algae and microbial fermentation using genetically engineered yeast. Biofuels have emerged as a sustainable, carbon-neutral alternative to fossil fuels, driven by growing energy demands and environmental concerns. Algae-based thermochemical hydrolysis has demonstrated high efficiency, achieving up to 98% glucose conversion under optimized conditions with cellulase. In contrast, fourth-generation techniques employ engineered yeast strains optimized for glycerol fermentation, with reported ethanol yields reaching 47.4%. Each method presents distinct advantages: thermochemical hydrolysis offers scalability and speed, while microbial fermentation provides high selectivity and effective carbon utilization. This review concludes that combining both approaches may offer a more robust and sustainable solution for large-scale bioethanol production.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
MATEC Web of Conferences
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/202541001026
Primary Topic
Biofuel production and bioconversion
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparation between Thermochemical Hydrolysis and Microbial Fermentation in Bioethanol Production

Xiangyu Wu
MATEC Web of Conferences
Biofuel production and bioconversion
article

Comparation between Thermochemical Hydrolysis and Microbial Fermentation in Bioethanol Production

Xiangyu Wu
article en

Abstract

This review compares third- and fourth-generation bioethanol production methods, focusing on thermochemical hydrolysis of algae and microbial fermentation using genetically engineered yeast. Biofuels have emerged as a sustainable, carbon-neutral alternative to fossil fuels, driven by growing energy demands and environmental concerns. Algae-based thermochemical hydrolysis has demonstrated high efficiency, achieving up to 98% glucose conversion under optimized conditions with cellulase. In contrast, fourth-generation techniques employ engineered yeast strains optimized for glycerol fermentation, with reported ethanol yields reaching 47.4%. Each method presents distinct advantages: thermochemical hydrolysis offers scalability and speed, while microbial fermentation provides high selectivity and effective carbon utilization. This review concludes that combining both approaches may offer a more robust and sustainable solution for large-scale bioethanol production.

MATEC Web of ConferencesVol. 410
University of Glasgow (GB), City of Glasgow College (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 83%
Biofuel production and bioconversion
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.