Comparison of Activated Carbon as a Traditional Nanoporous Adsorption Material and Emerging MOFs in Carbon Capture Technology

Metal-organic frameworks (MOFs), an emerging nanoporous material, have shown the potential to replace traditional activated carbon (AC) in carbon capture. The working principle, structure, adsorption performance, flexibility, and renewability of the two materials are thoroughly compared in this article. MOF shows a higher adsorption capacity due to its large specific surface area, greater selectivity, and rate of adsorption. However, MOF requires strict synthesis conditions. Additionally, the raw materials of producing MOFs are expensive, including the metal ions and organic ligands. On the contrary, AC has low cost of production and shows renewability. Nevertheless, its lifespan is short and the efficiency is somewhat low. This article’s investigation offers various theories regarding the mutual substitutability of MOF and AC. It is possible to select the appropriate one according to different environmental dependencies of the two materials to make them complement each other and thus capture carbon in a targeted manner.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
MATEC Web of Conferences
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/202541002006
Primary Topic
Metal-Organic Frameworks: Synthesis and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of Activated Carbon as a Traditional Nanoporous Adsorption Material and Emerging MOFs in Carbon Capture Technology

Xinyan Li
MATEC Web of Conferences
Metal-Organic Frameworks: Synthesis and Applications
article

Comparison of Activated Carbon as a Traditional Nanoporous Adsorption Material and Emerging MOFs in Carbon Capture Technology

Xinyan Li
article en

Abstract

Metal-organic frameworks (MOFs), an emerging nanoporous material, have shown the potential to replace traditional activated carbon (AC) in carbon capture. The working principle, structure, adsorption performance, flexibility, and renewability of the two materials are thoroughly compared in this article. MOF shows a higher adsorption capacity due to its large specific surface area, greater selectivity, and rate of adsorption. However, MOF requires strict synthesis conditions. Additionally, the raw materials of producing MOFs are expensive, including the metal ions and organic ligands. On the contrary, AC has low cost of production and shows renewability. Nevertheless, its lifespan is short and the efficiency is somewhat low. This article’s investigation offers various theories regarding the mutual substitutability of MOF and AC. It is possible to select the appropriate one according to different environmental dependencies of the two materials to make them complement each other and thus capture carbon in a targeted manner.

MATEC Web of ConferencesVol. 410
Tianma Microelectronics (China) (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 85%
Metal-Organic Frameworks: Synthesis and Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Comparison of Activated Carbon as a Traditional Nanoporous Adsorption Material and Emerging MOFs in Carbon Capture Technology — Xinyan Li · MATEC Web of Conferences (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS