GEDTM30: global ensemble digital terrain model at 30 m and derived multiscale terrain variables

Production and validation of an open global ensemble digital terrain model (GEDTM30) and derived terrain variables at 1 arc-s spacing grid ( <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math> 30 m spatial resolution) is described. Copernicus DEM, ALOS World3D, and object height models were combined in a data fusion approach to generate a globally consistent digital terrain model (DTM). This DTM was then used to compute 15 standard terrain variables across six scales (30, 60, 120, 240, 480 and 960 m). A global-to-local transfer learning model framework with 5° × 5° tiling leveraged globally distributed lidar datasets: ICESat-2 ATL08 (best-fit terrain height) and GEDI02 (lowest mode elevation), totaling over 30 billion training points. A global model was initially fitted using ICESat-2 and GEDI, followed by locally optimized models per tile, ensuring both global consistency and local accuracy. Independent validation shows that GEDTM30 reduces Copernicus DEM RMSE by about 25.4% in built-up areas, 10.0% in regions with 10-50% tree cover, and 27.3% in areas with over 50% tree cover. Compared to state-of-the-art DTMs (MERIT DEM, FABDEM and FathomDEM), GEDTM30 achieves the lowest vertical errors when assessed with GNSS station records, yielding a standard deviation of 7.77 m, an RMSE of 10.69 m, and a mean error of 7.34 m. FathomDEM exhibited the lowest vertical RMSE when validated against independent reference DTMs. GEDTM30 was further used to generate multiscale variables of topography and hydrology through an optimized tiling workflow ( <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math> 800 tiles of 600 × 600 km with <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math> 16% overlap) based on the Equi7 grid system. The entire workflow was implemented in Python using GDAL and Whitebox Workflows. Visual inspection confirmed the absence of boundary artifacts and the preservation of hydrologic connectivity. The tiling-based implementation significantly reduces computational costs of generating large-scale DTMs and derived terrain variables. The GEDTM30 dataset and code are publicly available as Cloud-Optimized GeoTIFFs <i>via</i> Zenodo and the OpenLandMap STAC. Further fusion with local lidar-based DTMs and national DTMs is recommended to enhance local accuracy and level of detail.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PeerJ
Published
2025-07-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.19673
Citations
7
Primary Topic
Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.72

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

GEDTM30: global ensemble digital terrain model at 30 m and derived multiscale terrain variables

Tomislav Hengl, Yu-Feng Ho, Carlos Henrique Grohmann, Leandro Parente et al.
7 citations
PeerJ
Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies
5.72
article

GEDTM30: global ensemble digital terrain model at 30 m and derived multiscale terrain variables

Tomislav Hengl, Yu-Feng Ho, Carlos Henrique Grohmann, Leandro Parente, H.I. Reuter, John B. Lindsay, Martijn Witjes
article en
7 citations

Abstract

Production and validation of an open global ensemble digital terrain model (GEDTM30) and derived terrain variables at 1 arc-s spacing grid ( <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math> 30 m spatial resolution) is described. Copernicus DEM, ALOS World3D, and object height models were combined in a data fusion approach to generate a globally consistent digital terrain model (DTM). This DTM was then used to compute 15 standard terrain variables across six scales (30, 60, 120, 240, 480 and 960 m). A global-to-local transfer learning model framework with 5° × 5° tiling leveraged globally distributed lidar datasets: ICESat-2 ATL08 (best-fit terrain height) and GEDI02 (lowest mode elevation), totaling over 30 billion training points. A global model was initially fitted using ICESat-2 and GEDI, followed by locally optimized models per tile, ensuring both global consistency and local accuracy. Independent validation shows that GEDTM30 reduces Copernicus DEM RMSE by about 25.4% in built-up areas, 10.0% in regions with 10-50% tree cover, and 27.3% in areas with over 50% tree cover. Compared to state-of-the-art DTMs (MERIT DEM, FABDEM and FathomDEM), GEDTM30 achieves the lowest vertical errors when assessed with GNSS station records, yielding a standard deviation of 7.77 m, an RMSE of 10.69 m, and a mean error of 7.34 m. FathomDEM exhibited the lowest vertical RMSE when validated against independent reference DTMs. GEDTM30 was further used to generate multiscale variables of topography and hydrology through an optimized tiling workflow ( <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math> 800 tiles of 600 × 600 km with <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math> 16% overlap) based on the Equi7 grid system. The entire workflow was implemented in Python using GDAL and Whitebox Workflows. Visual inspection confirmed the absence of boundary artifacts and the preservation of hydrologic connectivity. The tiling-based implementation significantly reduces computational costs of generating large-scale DTMs and derived terrain variables. The GEDTM30 dataset and code are publicly available as Cloud-Optimized GeoTIFFs <i>via</i> Zenodo and the OpenLandMap STAC. Further fusion with local lidar-based DTMs and national DTMs is recommended to enhance local accuracy and level of detail.

PeerJVol. 13
Eurostat (LU), Institute of Astronomy (RU), Open University of the Netherlands (NL), University of Guelph (CA), Universität Trier (DE)
Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies
5.72
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.