Which Local Governments Adopt New Technology First? Agency Size and Organizational Champions for Open Transit Data

Which local governments are first to adopt new technology to improve public service delivery? We develop a bureaucracy-driven account, arguing that agencies are constrained by their size, resources, and employee motivations. This means that efforts to adopt new technologies are more likely to succeed in larger agencies. We assess support for this argument by examining the adoption and use of online scheduling information for public transit (the General Transit Feed Specification [GTFS]), which makes transit far easier to use. In California, we find that large agencies where internal champions faced fewer technical and resource constraints outpaced smaller ones. Interview and survey evidence provide support for the mechanisms underpinning our theory. These results underscore the importance of studying organizational drivers of technology and policy adoption more broadly. They also suggest caveats to the decentralization and federalism literatures, which emphasize the citizen oversight and influence is typically greater in smaller jurisdictions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Urban Affairs Review
Published
2025-07-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/10780874251357506
Citations
1
Primary Topic
E-Government and Public Services
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.52
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Which Local Governments Adopt New Technology First? Agency Size and Organizational Champions for Open Transit Data

Mini Sheth, Alison E. Post, Tanu Kumar, Ishana Ratan
1 citations
Urban Affairs Review
E-Government and Public Services
8.52
article

Which Local Governments Adopt New Technology First? Agency Size and Organizational Champions for Open Transit Data

Mini Sheth, Alison E. Post, Tanu Kumar, Ishana Ratan
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Which local governments are first to adopt new technology to improve public service delivery? We develop a bureaucracy-driven account, arguing that agencies are constrained by their size, resources, and employee motivations. This means that efforts to adopt new technologies are more likely to succeed in larger agencies. We assess support for this argument by examining the adoption and use of online scheduling information for public transit (the General Transit Feed Specification [GTFS]), which makes transit far easier to use. In California, we find that large agencies where internal champions faced fewer technical and resource constraints outpaced smaller ones. Interview and survey evidence provide support for the mechanisms underpinning our theory. These results underscore the importance of studying organizational drivers of technology and policy adoption more broadly. They also suggest caveats to the decentralization and federalism literatures, which emphasize the citizen oversight and influence is typically greater in smaller jurisdictions.

Urban Affairs ReviewVol. 62(2)
Claremont Graduate University (US), University of California, Berkeley (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
E-Government and Public Services
8.52
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Which Local Governments Adopt New Technology First? Agency Size and Organizational Champions for Open Transit Data — Mini Sheth, Alison E. Post, et al. · Urban Affairs Review (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS