Research on University Teachers’ Perceptions of Gen‐AI From the Perspective of Actor‐Network Theory

Employing the lens of Actor‐Network Theory (ANT), this paper explores university educators’ perceptions of Gen‐AI and its potential impact on education through a qualitative research approach. It focuses on how educators perceive generative AI technologies and how these technologies influence their teaching practices and role identification. The study reveals that multiple factors shape teachers’ acceptance and utilization of AI, encompassing personal attitudes, student responses, teaching environments, and institutional policies. The interaction between teachers and AI is conceptualized as part of a human‐machine interaction network, where AI transcends being merely a teaching tool and is attributed human‐like qualities such as a wise mentor and learning companion. This research underscores that the realization of human‐AI integration necessitates a synergistic development between educators and technology, coupled with the concerted efforts of other actors within the educational ecosystem. The paper concludes by discussing the implications and challenges of human‐AI integration for educational reform.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Complexity
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1155/cplx/8885265
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Research on University Teachers’ Perceptions of Gen‐AI From the Perspective of Actor‐Network Theory

Yuwei Zhang, Yunlai Liu
Complexity
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

Research on University Teachers’ Perceptions of Gen‐AI From the Perspective of Actor‐Network Theory

Yuwei Zhang, Yunlai Liu
article en

Abstract

Employing the lens of Actor‐Network Theory (ANT), this paper explores university educators’ perceptions of Gen‐AI and its potential impact on education through a qualitative research approach. It focuses on how educators perceive generative AI technologies and how these technologies influence their teaching practices and role identification. The study reveals that multiple factors shape teachers’ acceptance and utilization of AI, encompassing personal attitudes, student responses, teaching environments, and institutional policies. The interaction between teachers and AI is conceptualized as part of a human‐machine interaction network, where AI transcends being merely a teaching tool and is attributed human‐like qualities such as a wise mentor and learning companion. This research underscores that the realization of human‐AI integration necessitates a synergistic development between educators and technology, coupled with the concerted efforts of other actors within the educational ecosystem. The paper concludes by discussing the implications and challenges of human‐AI integration for educational reform.

ComplexityVol. 2025(1)
Anqing Normal University (CN)
Anqing Normal University
Openalex Percentile: Top 83%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.