RAT DISSECTION ALTERNATIVES IN MALAYSIAN BIOLOGY EDUCATION: A NEED ANALYSIS

In rat dissection, students are found to be weak and unable to identify anatomical organs and draw and label them effectively in visual literacy. Since rat dissection is part of the Malaysian standardised curriculum, it must be preferred due to manipulative skill/dexterity acquisition. However, the problems in rat dissection persist. Many studies have suggested alternatives to replace hands-on rat dissection, aligning with humane education 3Rs principles (replacement, reduction, and refinement). Hence, there is a need to use animal-free alternatives as they allow the achievement of the learning objectives more effectively and have several advantages over animal use. Thus, this need analysis study researches the need for alternatives in sixth-form dissection practicals based on students’ and teachers’ perspectives. The survey involved 162 sixth-form students in the 2025/2026 batch and 86 teachers. The questionnaires have good validity and acceptable reliability. Both students and teachers agreed that rat dissection would increase one’s scientific manipulative skills. However, they knew their right not to perform dissection. Moreover, both students and teachers also agreed that rat dissection is unethical. These findings from the needs analysis study proved that, although they are proponents of rat dissections, they know the ethical issues that revolve around it and can opt out of them. More than 50% of the respondents, students, and teachers, say they will opt for the alternatives. Lastly, students and teachers strongly agreed that the 3D paper model and mobile application (second choice) are their preferred choices for solving anatomical organ identification and enhancing drawing and labelling skills. They also strongly agreed that sustainability has to be the key feature for alternatives to be effective. These results indicate that the alternatives for rat dissection are needed and necessary to either complement or replace rat dissection.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Education Psychology and Counseling
Published
2025-06-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.35631/ijepc.1058008
Primary Topic
Animal testing and alternatives
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

RAT DISSECTION ALTERNATIVES IN MALAYSIAN BIOLOGY EDUCATION: A NEED ANALYSIS

Rosmilah Misnan, Muhamad Ikhwan Mat Saad, Hyukmin Lee, Yoke Seng Wong et al.
International Journal of Education Psychology and Counseling
Animal testing and alternatives
article

RAT DISSECTION ALTERNATIVES IN MALAYSIAN BIOLOGY EDUCATION: A NEED ANALYSIS

Rosmilah Misnan, Muhamad Ikhwan Mat Saad, Hyukmin Lee, Yoke Seng Wong, Chern Zhong Teoh
article en

Abstract

In rat dissection, students are found to be weak and unable to identify anatomical organs and draw and label them effectively in visual literacy. Since rat dissection is part of the Malaysian standardised curriculum, it must be preferred due to manipulative skill/dexterity acquisition. However, the problems in rat dissection persist. Many studies have suggested alternatives to replace hands-on rat dissection, aligning with humane education 3Rs principles (replacement, reduction, and refinement). Hence, there is a need to use animal-free alternatives as they allow the achievement of the learning objectives more effectively and have several advantages over animal use. Thus, this need analysis study researches the need for alternatives in sixth-form dissection practicals based on students’ and teachers’ perspectives. The survey involved 162 sixth-form students in the 2025/2026 batch and 86 teachers. The questionnaires have good validity and acceptable reliability. Both students and teachers agreed that rat dissection would increase one’s scientific manipulative skills. However, they knew their right not to perform dissection. Moreover, both students and teachers also agreed that rat dissection is unethical. These findings from the needs analysis study proved that, although they are proponents of rat dissections, they know the ethical issues that revolve around it and can opt out of them. More than 50% of the respondents, students, and teachers, say they will opt for the alternatives. Lastly, students and teachers strongly agreed that the 3D paper model and mobile application (second choice) are their preferred choices for solving anatomical organ identification and enhancing drawing and labelling skills. They also strongly agreed that sustainability has to be the key feature for alternatives to be effective. These results indicate that the alternatives for rat dissection are needed and necessary to either complement or replace rat dissection.

International Journal of Education Psychology and CounselingVol. 10(58)
Sultan Idris Education University (MY)
Openalex Percentile: Top 80%
Animal testing and alternatives
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.