DEBATE TRAINING IN LANGUAGE EDUCATION: TRENDS, STRATEGIES, AND PEDAGOGICAL IMPLICATIONS - A STRUCTURED LITERATURE REVIEW

Debate training has become an influential instructional approach in the field of language education, contributing to the development of learners' communication abilities, critical thinking, and persuasive skills. As teaching methodologies continue to advance, the integration of debate as a teaching strategy has drawn increased interest due to its capacity to create dynamic learning experiences, encourage intercultural understanding, and strengthen spoken language proficiency. Although its advantages are widely acknowledged, there remains a need for a comprehensive investigation into the current practices, methods, and educational implications of implementing debate activities in language learning contexts. This systematic literature review (SLR) explores prior studies related to debate training within language instruction, emphasizing recent patterns, teaching techniques, and its broader influence on educational outcomes. The review adheres to PRISMA procedures to select, evaluate, and synthesize scholarly articles retrieved from high-impact academic databases, including Scopus and Web of Science (WoS), with a publication range from 2020 to 2024. A total of 13 relevant studies were identified and included in the final analysis. The results were organized into three main thematic categories: (1) trends in debate training, (2) strategies for implementation and (3) pedagogical implications. The analysis explores how debate is integrated into language teaching, the instructional methods employed, and the outcomes reported in second-language learning contexts. Findings reveal that debate training has increasingly been implemented using technology-assisted learning, collaborative frameworks, and structured argumentation models. Empirical evidence highlights improvements in language fluency, argumentation structure, and adaptability among students engaged in debate-based learning. Additionally, studies indicate that integrating debate into curricula enhances student engagement, intercultural competence, and critical discourse abilities. However, challenges such as classroom management, accessibility, and teacher preparedness remain key considerations. The study concludes that debate training is a valuable approach in language teaching, offering a structured yet dynamic platform for enhancing

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Education Psychology and Counseling
Published
2025-06-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.35631/ijepc.1058003
Primary Topic
Education and Critical Thinking Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

DEBATE TRAINING IN LANGUAGE EDUCATION: TRENDS, STRATEGIES, AND PEDAGOGICAL IMPLICATIONS - A STRUCTURED LITERATURE REVIEW

Harun Baharudin, Fatihah Safie
International Journal of Education Psychology and Counseling
Education and Critical Thinking Development
article

DEBATE TRAINING IN LANGUAGE EDUCATION: TRENDS, STRATEGIES, AND PEDAGOGICAL IMPLICATIONS - A STRUCTURED LITERATURE REVIEW

Harun Baharudin, Fatihah Safie
article en

Abstract

Debate training has become an influential instructional approach in the field of language education, contributing to the development of learners' communication abilities, critical thinking, and persuasive skills. As teaching methodologies continue to advance, the integration of debate as a teaching strategy has drawn increased interest due to its capacity to create dynamic learning experiences, encourage intercultural understanding, and strengthen spoken language proficiency. Although its advantages are widely acknowledged, there remains a need for a comprehensive investigation into the current practices, methods, and educational implications of implementing debate activities in language learning contexts. This systematic literature review (SLR) explores prior studies related to debate training within language instruction, emphasizing recent patterns, teaching techniques, and its broader influence on educational outcomes. The review adheres to PRISMA procedures to select, evaluate, and synthesize scholarly articles retrieved from high-impact academic databases, including Scopus and Web of Science (WoS), with a publication range from 2020 to 2024. A total of 13 relevant studies were identified and included in the final analysis. The results were organized into three main thematic categories: (1) trends in debate training, (2) strategies for implementation and (3) pedagogical implications. The analysis explores how debate is integrated into language teaching, the instructional methods employed, and the outcomes reported in second-language learning contexts. Findings reveal that debate training has increasingly been implemented using technology-assisted learning, collaborative frameworks, and structured argumentation models. Empirical evidence highlights improvements in language fluency, argumentation structure, and adaptability among students engaged in debate-based learning. Additionally, studies indicate that integrating debate into curricula enhances student engagement, intercultural competence, and critical discourse abilities. However, challenges such as classroom management, accessibility, and teacher preparedness remain key considerations. The study concludes that debate training is a valuable approach in language teaching, offering a structured yet dynamic platform for enhancing

International Journal of Education Psychology and CounselingVol. 10(58)
National University of Malaysia (MY)
Openalex Percentile: Top 80%
Education and Critical Thinking Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.