Is there any strategy in university strategic plans? A comparative study of the tone and content of strategic plans of Australian universities

This study analyses the strategic plans of Australia’s 40 universities, assessing their tone, content and coherence. Using sentiment analysis and comparative content evaluation, we contrast these plans with those of leading US universities and major Australian government departments. We find that Australian university plans adopt a markedly more positive and aspirational tone, shaped by distinct institutional and cultural contexts. However, they often lack core strategic elements such as clear performance metrics, competitive positioning and engagement with institutional challenges. As a result, while these plans seek to convey legitimacy, excellence and high standards, they often lack the depth and specificity required to provide meaningful strategic direction. Drawing on signalling and legitimacy theories, we argue that such documents function primarily as instruments of reputational alignment and normative conformity, rather than actionable strategy documents. JEL Classification: M10 Business Administration, General

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Australian Journal of Management
Published
2025-07-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/03128962251350347
Primary Topic
Organizational Strategy and Culture
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Is there any strategy in university strategic plans? A comparative study of the tone and content of strategic plans of Australian universities

Massimo Garbuio, Clinton Free
Australian Journal of Management
Organizational Strategy and Culture
article

Is there any strategy in university strategic plans? A comparative study of the tone and content of strategic plans of Australian universities

Massimo Garbuio, Clinton Free
article en

Abstract

This study analyses the strategic plans of Australia’s 40 universities, assessing their tone, content and coherence. Using sentiment analysis and comparative content evaluation, we contrast these plans with those of leading US universities and major Australian government departments. We find that Australian university plans adopt a markedly more positive and aspirational tone, shaped by distinct institutional and cultural contexts. However, they often lack core strategic elements such as clear performance metrics, competitive positioning and engagement with institutional challenges. As a result, while these plans seek to convey legitimacy, excellence and high standards, they often lack the depth and specificity required to provide meaningful strategic direction. Drawing on signalling and legitimacy theories, we argue that such documents function primarily as instruments of reputational alignment and normative conformity, rather than actionable strategy documents. JEL Classification: M10 Business Administration, General

Australian Journal of Management
The University of Sydney (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 79%
Organizational Strategy and Culture
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.