Echoes of Violence: The Far-Reaching Consequences of Global Terrorism

n this analysis of terrorism, we attempt to understand how frequently violent acts occur in different parts of the world and how they have evolved historically. To achieve this, we need a clear and concise explanation of what constitutes terrorism and how it varies from other forms of violence. There is no official definition of terrorism because this circumstance involves a difficulty with subjectivity. The protracted debate and lack of consensus over a definition have prevented the UN from ever crafting a strong resolution combating international terrorism. The main problem is that it can be difficult to distinguish political violence and criminal behavior like terrorism from other forms of violence, such murder or hate crimes, non-state armed conflicts, state-based armed conflicts, and one-sided violence. Making the distinctions between these many types of violence could be difficult. It is also necessary for the criminal to be a non-state or sub national entity. As long as people with real or imagined grievances have the capacity to become radicalized, there will always be armed non-state actors who use violence to achieve their objectives. Since terrorism was likely one of the main objectives of US foreign policy, it garnered a lot of attention.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
JOURNAL GLOBAL VALUES
Published
2025-06-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.31995/jgv.2025.v16i01.015
Primary Topic
Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Echoes of Violence: The Far-Reaching Consequences of Global Terrorism

Kauser Firdos Jafaree
1 links
JOURNAL GLOBAL VALUES
Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence
article

Echoes of Violence: The Far-Reaching Consequences of Global Terrorism

Kauser Firdos Jafaree
article en

Abstract

n this analysis of terrorism, we attempt to understand how frequently violent acts occur in different parts of the world and how they have evolved historically. To achieve this, we need a clear and concise explanation of what constitutes terrorism and how it varies from other forms of violence. There is no official definition of terrorism because this circumstance involves a difficulty with subjectivity. The protracted debate and lack of consensus over a definition have prevented the UN from ever crafting a strong resolution combating international terrorism. The main problem is that it can be difficult to distinguish political violence and criminal behavior like terrorism from other forms of violence, such murder or hate crimes, non-state armed conflicts, state-based armed conflicts, and one-sided violence. Making the distinctions between these many types of violence could be difficult. It is also necessary for the criminal to be a non-state or sub national entity. As long as people with real or imagined grievances have the capacity to become radicalized, there will always be armed non-state actors who use violence to achieve their objectives. Since terrorism was likely one of the main objectives of US foreign policy, it garnered a lot of attention.

JOURNAL GLOBAL VALUESVol. XVI(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 75%
Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.