Sex Differences in Bench Press Strength and Power: A Velocity-Based Analysis Adjusted for Body Composition

<b>Background:</b> Resistance training (RT) promotes muscle hypertrophy and strength gains in both men and women. However, sex differences in neuromuscular performance, muscle fiber composition, and the hormonal environment influence strength and power adaptations. While men generally exhibit greater absolute and relative strength, it remains unclear to what extent these differences persist across various load intensities. A better understanding of sex-specific strength and power profiles may help optimize training strategies. The aim of this study was to compare strength and power performance during the bench press exercise in physically active males and females, relative to body mass and fat-free mass (FFM). <b>Methods:</b> Twenty-nine physically active individuals (16 men: 21.3 ± 4.1 years, 13 women: 22.6 ± 4.9 years) performed a one-repetition maximum (1RM) test and an incremental velocity-based assessment at 45%, 55%, 65%, 75%, and 85% of the 1RM using a Smith machine. The barbell velocity was measured via a linear transducer, with the mean propulsive velocity (MPV) recorded for each load. Power-related variables (e.g., peak force [F0], maximal velocity [V0], and maximal power [Pmax]) were analyzed. To account for differences in body composition, data were adjusted for body mass and FFM. <b>Results:</b> Men exhibited significantly greater strength and power than women across most loads when adjusted for both body mass and fat-free mass (FFM) (<i>p</i> < 0.05). These differences were particularly pronounced when normalized to FFM (45-75%1RM; <i>p</i> = 0.001-0.031), with large effect sizes observed (ηp<sup>2</sup> = 0.185-0.383). Notably, sex differences in mean propulsive velocity (MPV) disappeared at 85%1RM (<i>p</i> = 0.208; ηp<sup>2</sup> = 0.06), suggesting that maximal neuromuscular recruitment may minimize sex-related disparities at higher intensities. Furthermore, men demonstrated significantly higher values in six of the seven power-related variables, with no significant differences in the %1RM required to achieve an optimal power output. <b>Conclusions:</b> These findings confirm that men exhibit greater strength and power than women, even after adjusting for body composition. However, at high relative loads (≥85%1RM), sex differences in movement velocity appear to diminish, likely due to similar recruitment patterns of high-threshold motor units. These results highlight the importance of sex-specific resistance training programs, particularly in relation to load prescription and the application of velocity-based training methods.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Functional Morphology and Kinesiology
Published
2025-07-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jfmk10030284
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Sports Performance and Training
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.72
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Sex Differences in Bench Press Strength and Power: A Velocity-Based Analysis Adjusted for Body Composition

Raúl Nieto-Acevedo, Valentín E. Fernández-Elías, Amelia Guadalupe‐Grau, Olga López‐Torres
1 citations
Journal of Functional Morphology and Kinesiology
Sports Performance and Training
1.72
article

Sex Differences in Bench Press Strength and Power: A Velocity-Based Analysis Adjusted for Body Composition

Raúl Nieto-Acevedo, Valentín E. Fernández-Elías, Amelia Guadalupe‐Grau, Olga López‐Torres
article en
1 citations

Abstract

<b>Background:</b> Resistance training (RT) promotes muscle hypertrophy and strength gains in both men and women. However, sex differences in neuromuscular performance, muscle fiber composition, and the hormonal environment influence strength and power adaptations. While men generally exhibit greater absolute and relative strength, it remains unclear to what extent these differences persist across various load intensities. A better understanding of sex-specific strength and power profiles may help optimize training strategies. The aim of this study was to compare strength and power performance during the bench press exercise in physically active males and females, relative to body mass and fat-free mass (FFM). <b>Methods:</b> Twenty-nine physically active individuals (16 men: 21.3 ± 4.1 years, 13 women: 22.6 ± 4.9 years) performed a one-repetition maximum (1RM) test and an incremental velocity-based assessment at 45%, 55%, 65%, 75%, and 85% of the 1RM using a Smith machine. The barbell velocity was measured via a linear transducer, with the mean propulsive velocity (MPV) recorded for each load. Power-related variables (e.g., peak force [F0], maximal velocity [V0], and maximal power [Pmax]) were analyzed. To account for differences in body composition, data were adjusted for body mass and FFM. <b>Results:</b> Men exhibited significantly greater strength and power than women across most loads when adjusted for both body mass and fat-free mass (FFM) (<i>p</i> < 0.05). These differences were particularly pronounced when normalized to FFM (45-75%1RM; <i>p</i> = 0.001-0.031), with large effect sizes observed (ηp<sup>2</sup> = 0.185-0.383). Notably, sex differences in mean propulsive velocity (MPV) disappeared at 85%1RM (<i>p</i> = 0.208; ηp<sup>2</sup> = 0.06), suggesting that maximal neuromuscular recruitment may minimize sex-related disparities at higher intensities. Furthermore, men demonstrated significantly higher values in six of the seven power-related variables, with no significant differences in the %1RM required to achieve an optimal power output. <b>Conclusions:</b> These findings confirm that men exhibit greater strength and power than women, even after adjusting for body composition. However, at high relative loads (≥85%1RM), sex differences in movement velocity appear to diminish, likely due to similar recruitment patterns of high-threshold motor units. These results highlight the importance of sex-specific resistance training programs, particularly in relation to load prescription and the application of velocity-based training methods.

Journal of Functional Morphology and KinesiologyVol. 10(3)
Universidad Rey Juan Carlos (ES), Instituto de Salud Carlos III (ES), Universidad Alfonso X el Sabio (ES), Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Fragilidad y Envejecimiento Saludable (ES), University of Castilla-La Mancha (ES), Universidad Europea de Madrid (ES)
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Sports Performance and Training
1.72
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.