Assessment of laboratory O<sub>4</sub> (O<sub>2</sub>–O<sub>2</sub> collision-induced) absorption cross-sections at 360 nm using atmospheric long-path DOAS observations

Abstract. Absorption of light in the atmosphere by collision-induced absorption (CIA) by two oxygen molecules O2–O2, in the following referred to as O4, can be used to derive properties of aerosols and clouds from remote sensing observations. In recent years, inconsistencies between the measured atmospheric O4 absorption and radiative transfer simulations were found for Multi-AXis Differential Optical Absorption Spectroscopy (MAX-DOAS) measurements. In the presented study, over two years of observations from a long-path (LP-) DOAS instrument deployed at the German research station Neumayer, Antarctica, are analysed. While MAX-DOAS instruments measure spectra of scattered sunlight at different elevation angles, LP-DOAS utilises an artificial light source and the atmospheric absorptions are measured along a fixed (and well-defined) light path close to the surface. Further, the pristine measurement location allows one to investigate the relation between measured and modelled O4 absorption over a large range of temperatures (−45 to +5 °C). Overall good agreement is found between the retrieved O4 absorption cross-sections covering the absorption band at 360 nm and laboratory measurements. While the best agreement is obtained for the Finkenzeller and Volkamer (2022) cross-sections, deviations at cold ambient temperatures (below ca. −25 °C) are observed for the Thalman and Volkamer (2013) cross-sections. Other O4 absorption bands could not be investigated because these are not (fully) within the spectral range of the measured spectra. This study strongly supports the accuracy of commonly used O4 absorption cross-sections in DOAS analyses, while more work is needed to understand the earlier reported inconsistencies in MAX-DOAS observations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Atmospheric measurement techniques
Published
2025-07-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-3393-2025
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.21

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessment of laboratory O4 (O2–O2 collision-induced) absorption cross-sections at 360 nm using atmospheric long-path DOAS observations

Bianca Lauster, U. Platt, Udo Frieß, Jan-Marcus Nasse et al.
2 citations
Atmospheric measurement techniques
Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics
2.21
article

Assessment of laboratory O4 (O2–O2 collision-induced) absorption cross-sections at 360 nm using atmospheric long-path DOAS observations

Bianca Lauster, U. Platt, Udo Frieß, Jan-Marcus Nasse, Thomas Wagner
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Abstract. Absorption of light in the atmosphere by collision-induced absorption (CIA) by two oxygen molecules O2–O2, in the following referred to as O4, can be used to derive properties of aerosols and clouds from remote sensing observations. In recent years, inconsistencies between the measured atmospheric O4 absorption and radiative transfer simulations were found for Multi-AXis Differential Optical Absorption Spectroscopy (MAX-DOAS) measurements. In the presented study, over two years of observations from a long-path (LP-) DOAS instrument deployed at the German research station Neumayer, Antarctica, are analysed. While MAX-DOAS instruments measure spectra of scattered sunlight at different elevation angles, LP-DOAS utilises an artificial light source and the atmospheric absorptions are measured along a fixed (and well-defined) light path close to the surface. Further, the pristine measurement location allows one to investigate the relation between measured and modelled O4 absorption over a large range of temperatures (−45 to +5 °C). Overall good agreement is found between the retrieved O4 absorption cross-sections covering the absorption band at 360 nm and laboratory measurements. While the best agreement is obtained for the Finkenzeller and Volkamer (2022) cross-sections, deviations at cold ambient temperatures (below ca. −25 °C) are observed for the Thalman and Volkamer (2013) cross-sections. Other O4 absorption bands could not be investigated because these are not (fully) within the spectral range of the measured spectra. This study strongly supports the accuracy of commonly used O4 absorption cross-sections in DOAS analyses, while more work is needed to understand the earlier reported inconsistencies in MAX-DOAS observations.

Atmospheric measurement techniquesVol. 18(14)
Energie Baden-Württemberg (Germany) (DE), Heidelberg University (DE), Max Planck Institute for Chemistry (DE)
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, Max-Planck-Gesellschaft
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics
2.21
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.