Paying with points versus delaying redemption: How payment methods shape satisfaction and return intentions

Drawing on self-perception theory, this research finds that redeeming loyalty points, rather than saving them and paying with money, increases return intentions to service establishments. The positive effect of paying with loyalty points is driven by increased satisfaction. Furthermore, this effect is moderated by the offer of bonus incentives, such that the positive effect is attenuated when consumers forgo a bonus offer in exchange for saving points. Two studies confirm these effects. Study 1 demonstrates that redeeming points leads to higher satisfaction, which drives increased return intentions. Study 2 shows that bonus incentives can diminish these benefits, as consumers who forgo a bonus experience reactance, leading to lower satisfaction. The findings highlight the dual impact of loyalty program design: point redemption fosters loyalty, but poorly designed bonus incentives can unintentionally counteract these benefits. For practitioners, the results suggest encouraging point redemption to maximize satisfaction and loyalty. However, caution is warranted, as bonuses may undermine program effectiveness if not redeemed. This research enhances understanding of the dynamics of loyalty programs and payment methods, offering practical insights for boosting loyalty.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Market Research
Published
2025-07-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/14707853251362954
Primary Topic
Consumer Retail Behavior Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Paying with points versus delaying redemption: How payment methods shape satisfaction and return intentions

Laura Boman
International Journal of Market Research
Consumer Retail Behavior Studies
article

Paying with points versus delaying redemption: How payment methods shape satisfaction and return intentions

Laura Boman
article en

Abstract

Drawing on self-perception theory, this research finds that redeeming loyalty points, rather than saving them and paying with money, increases return intentions to service establishments. The positive effect of paying with loyalty points is driven by increased satisfaction. Furthermore, this effect is moderated by the offer of bonus incentives, such that the positive effect is attenuated when consumers forgo a bonus offer in exchange for saving points. Two studies confirm these effects. Study 1 demonstrates that redeeming points leads to higher satisfaction, which drives increased return intentions. Study 2 shows that bonus incentives can diminish these benefits, as consumers who forgo a bonus experience reactance, leading to lower satisfaction. The findings highlight the dual impact of loyalty program design: point redemption fosters loyalty, but poorly designed bonus incentives can unintentionally counteract these benefits. For practitioners, the results suggest encouraging point redemption to maximize satisfaction and loyalty. However, caution is warranted, as bonuses may undermine program effectiveness if not redeemed. This research enhances understanding of the dynamics of loyalty programs and payment methods, offering practical insights for boosting loyalty.

International Journal of Market ResearchVol. 67(5)
Kennesaw State University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 77%
Consumer Retail Behavior Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Paying with points versus delaying redemption: How payment methods shape satisfaction and return intentions — Laura Boman · International Journal of Market Research (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS