Intervention in Crisis: Understanding the Role of Mental Illness in Bystander Decision-Making Using Audio Vignettes

Research highlights that people with mental illness are significantly more likely to experience victimization events compared with the general population. Generally, studies have noted the importance of guardianship in preventing victimization among this population; however, prior investigations have neglected to examine the role of bystanders’ willingness to intervene in risky scenarios involving a person exhibiting mental illness. To address this gap, this study utilizes data collected from a factorial survey design and audio vignettes to explore how situational and individual-level characteristics influence indirect bystander intervention in scenarios involving a hypothetical victim displaying signs of mental illness. Findings show that participants were significantly less likely to intervene in situations involving a victim exhibiting signs of mental illness. Indirect bystander intervention was also influenced by victim/offenders’ sex, location of the event, severity of aggression, and participants’ personal ties to mental illness, particularly through romantic relationships. Implications for intervention are discussed.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Criminal Justice and Behavior
Published
2025-07-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/00938548251359591
Primary Topic
Child Abuse and Trauma
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Intervention in Crisis: Understanding the Role of Mental Illness in Bystander Decision-Making Using Audio Vignettes

Chrystina Y. Hoffman, Leah E. Daigle, Rebecca Headley Konkel, Michelle N. Harris
Criminal Justice and Behavior
Child Abuse and Trauma
article

Intervention in Crisis: Understanding the Role of Mental Illness in Bystander Decision-Making Using Audio Vignettes

Chrystina Y. Hoffman, Leah E. Daigle, Rebecca Headley Konkel, Michelle N. Harris
article en

Abstract

Research highlights that people with mental illness are significantly more likely to experience victimization events compared with the general population. Generally, studies have noted the importance of guardianship in preventing victimization among this population; however, prior investigations have neglected to examine the role of bystanders’ willingness to intervene in risky scenarios involving a person exhibiting mental illness. To address this gap, this study utilizes data collected from a factorial survey design and audio vignettes to explore how situational and individual-level characteristics influence indirect bystander intervention in scenarios involving a hypothetical victim displaying signs of mental illness. Findings show that participants were significantly less likely to intervene in situations involving a victim exhibiting signs of mental illness. Indirect bystander intervention was also influenced by victim/offenders’ sex, location of the event, severity of aggression, and participants’ personal ties to mental illness, particularly through romantic relationships. Implications for intervention are discussed.

Criminal Justice and BehaviorVol. 52(11)
University of North Carolina at Charlotte (US), Georgia State University (US), University of Wisconsin–Milwaukee (US), University of West Florida (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 75%
Child Abuse and Trauma
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.