Defining indicators of active community forest management: basis for assessing sustainable forest management in Nepal

The community forestry program of Nepal is one of the leading forest management approaches in the world. Despite several success stories, this program has been criticized for its passiveness or protection-oriented management approach. Though several recommendations from previous researchers have been made to shift the management approach towards active forest management, few studies have been conducted to identify the measurable indicators of it. Therefore, this study aimed to identify measurable indicators of degree of active community forest management using the renowned Delphi survey techniques. The survey consulted ten experts with a minimum of twenty years of direct experience in community forestry projects, either in implementation, research, or policy development, were participated to identify themes, indicators, and verifiers of active community forest management. The study revealed seven themes, thirty indicators, and ninety verifiers for considering the community forest to be managed actively. These seven themes include objectives and management practices, forest health and ecosystem, participation and governance, policy and legal framework, institutional capacity, forest goods and services, and climate change. Among these themes, clarifying management objectives was found to be the major step, followed by the production of forest goods and services. The findings of this study offer a robust framework for assessing the activeness of community forest management and assessing the performance of community forest user groups to identify areas for improvement. Similarly, policymakers and practitioners can utilize these indicators to develop effective monitoring tools and design capacity-building initiatives that directly address key elements of active community forest management for improved outcomes. Further, research exploring the framework's strengths and weaknesses through empirical validation in different settings and under changing socio-economic, policy, and environmental conditions is recommended.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Discover Forests
Published
2025-07-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s44415-025-00017-0
Primary Topic
Forest Management and Policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Defining indicators of active community forest management: basis for assessing sustainable forest management in Nepal

Sandesh Dhakal, Suman Bhattarai, Sher Bahadur Pariyar
Discover Forests
Forest Management and Policy
article

Defining indicators of active community forest management: basis for assessing sustainable forest management in Nepal

Sandesh Dhakal, Suman Bhattarai, Sher Bahadur Pariyar
article en

Abstract

The community forestry program of Nepal is one of the leading forest management approaches in the world. Despite several success stories, this program has been criticized for its passiveness or protection-oriented management approach. Though several recommendations from previous researchers have been made to shift the management approach towards active forest management, few studies have been conducted to identify the measurable indicators of it. Therefore, this study aimed to identify measurable indicators of degree of active community forest management using the renowned Delphi survey techniques. The survey consulted ten experts with a minimum of twenty years of direct experience in community forestry projects, either in implementation, research, or policy development, were participated to identify themes, indicators, and verifiers of active community forest management. The study revealed seven themes, thirty indicators, and ninety verifiers for considering the community forest to be managed actively. These seven themes include objectives and management practices, forest health and ecosystem, participation and governance, policy and legal framework, institutional capacity, forest goods and services, and climate change. Among these themes, clarifying management objectives was found to be the major step, followed by the production of forest goods and services. The findings of this study offer a robust framework for assessing the activeness of community forest management and assessing the performance of community forest user groups to identify areas for improvement. Similarly, policymakers and practitioners can utilize these indicators to develop effective monitoring tools and design capacity-building initiatives that directly address key elements of active community forest management for improved outcomes. Further, research exploring the framework's strengths and weaknesses through empirical validation in different settings and under changing socio-economic, policy, and environmental conditions is recommended.

Discover ForestsVol. 1(1)
Tribhuvan University (NP)
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 83%
Forest Management and Policy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.