The digital reproduction of the state: Public diplomacy, digital entitativity, and strategic ontology

How do states engage in strategic ontology via digital diplomacy? Existing arguments about digital diplomacy focus on everyday practices, overlooking its ontological implications through reproducing states for lay people, whose use of social media forms part of their knowledge discourse about world politics. The author argues that states employ digital diplomacy to engage in strategic ontology to manage narratives about themselves. Such a strategy induces what the author calls ‘digital entitativity’ or people’s perceptions that a state is a whole with intentions via digital means. Using a hermeneutic approach to discourse analysis, the article analyzes the People’s Republic of China’s public diplomacy efforts on Twitter/X to present itself digitally to international audiences by producing and circulating summit-related content. The article identifies themes that disrupt and conform to normalized practices of digital diplomacy that suggest China’s perception of its place in the existing international order. This has implications for understanding how digital diplomacy could be a disruptive international practice as states use digital communication tools to produce and manage international narratives for strategic ontology purposes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Media War & Conflict
Published
2025-07-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/17506352251350327
Citations
1
Primary Topic
International Relations and Foreign Policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.52

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The digital reproduction of the state: Public diplomacy, digital entitativity, and strategic ontology

Minseon Ku
1 citations
Media War & Conflict
International Relations and Foreign Policy
8.52
article

The digital reproduction of the state: Public diplomacy, digital entitativity, and strategic ontology

Minseon Ku
article en
1 citations

Abstract

How do states engage in strategic ontology via digital diplomacy? Existing arguments about digital diplomacy focus on everyday practices, overlooking its ontological implications through reproducing states for lay people, whose use of social media forms part of their knowledge discourse about world politics. The author argues that states employ digital diplomacy to engage in strategic ontology to manage narratives about themselves. Such a strategy induces what the author calls ‘digital entitativity’ or people’s perceptions that a state is a whole with intentions via digital means. Using a hermeneutic approach to discourse analysis, the article analyzes the People’s Republic of China’s public diplomacy efforts on Twitter/X to present itself digitally to international audiences by producing and circulating summit-related content. The article identifies themes that disrupt and conform to normalized practices of digital diplomacy that suggest China’s perception of its place in the existing international order. This has implications for understanding how digital diplomacy could be a disruptive international practice as states use digital communication tools to produce and manage international narratives for strategic ontology purposes.

Media War & ConflictVol. 18(4)
William & Mary (US), Williams (United States) (US)
College of William and Mary
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
International Relations and Foreign Policy
8.52
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The digital reproduction of the state: Public diplomacy, digital entitativity, and strategic ontology — Minseon Ku · Media War & Conflict (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS