A Green Light to Executive Pay: Institutional Monitors and Pay Sensitivity to Carbon Performance

Abstract We test for relations among executive compensation premia and firm carbon performance under varying degrees of institutional investor monitoring. Using US data for 2010–2023 (15,836 firm‐years), we find that low carbon emissions firms remunerate more excessively than high emitters, indicating greater rent extraction. Excess pay to carbon performance sensitivity relates non‐linearly to institutional investors’ ownership. Although outside monitors initially discipline against overcompensating managers, carbon performance leads to more excessive pay when powerful institutional blockholders hold a controlling stake. Drawing on agency and institutional perspectives, we assert that pressure on US firms and financial institutions to decarbonize has benefitted managers of low emitting firms with a relatively stronger hand in pay bargaining.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
British Journal of Management
Published
2025-07-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.70004
Primary Topic
Corporate Finance and Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Green Light to Executive Pay: Institutional Monitors and Pay Sensitivity to Carbon Performance

Danial Hemmings, Lynn Hodgkinson, Gwion Williams
British Journal of Management
Corporate Finance and Governance
article

A Green Light to Executive Pay: Institutional Monitors and Pay Sensitivity to Carbon Performance

Danial Hemmings, Lynn Hodgkinson, Gwion Williams
article en

Abstract

Abstract We test for relations among executive compensation premia and firm carbon performance under varying degrees of institutional investor monitoring. Using US data for 2010–2023 (15,836 firm‐years), we find that low carbon emissions firms remunerate more excessively than high emitters, indicating greater rent extraction. Excess pay to carbon performance sensitivity relates non‐linearly to institutional investors’ ownership. Although outside monitors initially discipline against overcompensating managers, carbon performance leads to more excessive pay when powerful institutional blockholders hold a controlling stake. Drawing on agency and institutional perspectives, we assert that pressure on US firms and financial institutions to decarbonize has benefitted managers of low emitting firms with a relatively stronger hand in pay bargaining.

British Journal of ManagementVol. 37(1)
Bangor University (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
Corporate Finance and Governance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.